well, consider this.--
in a very short period, putin has absolutely destroyed russia's conventional military. he has personally expanded the territories of the nato alliance right up to russia's borders, with the ascension of sweden and finnland into nato membership.
i believe in a relatively quick series of events both the ukraine and belarus shall apply for membership into nato, and that both will be accepted.
putin has pushed turkey into a closer relationship with nato, and away from any adventures with russia. in case you had not noticed, turkey has become a very substantial player, and "influencer," on the world stage.
putin has done this, while almost single-handedly, destroyed the russian demographic, driving its most productive segments into external and internal exile, and alienating them from the russian state, and "the russian way of doing things."
and, finally, putin is driving the --stans into association with the west, and doing very little to inhibit the integration of the --stans into western associations, structures, and yes, political affiliations. modernity, and modern economy, education & finance is in a headlong rush into russia's former provinces. and, all of it, i believe to be by the active influence of v. putin.
so, i ask again (and more or less suggest), that v. putin acts almost universally in the interests of the west, and almost diametrically opposed to the long term interests of russia as a power upon the world stage. no one single person has done what putin has done to drain its influence in the world.
putin sought power and influence by association with china and india. for those two countries, the question must be posed, just what do they gain by association with russia, decrepit as it is becoming, and as self destructing as it has become under putin. to my way of viewing things, putin & russia are not longer assets by association, but, a positive drag on the power and influence of anyone (in terms of nation states) that would associate with him.
he has become the poor coursin on the world state.
oh, putin and russia have the nukes. but what good are they? will russia's nukes, and associated "saber rattling" help china take the "jewel" of taiwan. will the kuznetzov, rotting in dry dock without a crew, be a force to be reckoned with by the u.s. navy in the taiwan straights? russia does absolutely nothing to help china's pretensions to world power, in any real sense.
pariah's are worthless, in any context. they lend absolutely nothing in terms of one's pretensions to legitimacy and influence. and, as noted, putin does nothing except revitalize and expand the west's influence. he is, i believe, the tool of the west, in only an unwitting one (as befits a nitwit.)
john jay @ 04.12.2023
p.s. the answer to my question at the head of the post? well, it is in the last sentence of the post. it is, indeed, a "wrap."