summer patriot, winter soldier

in brief, in california, the election is not over until the democrat wins .... simple as that ....

simple as that.  7,000 votes behind?  if you are a democrat, you just "harvest" ***  8,000 more ballots: they'll all be for you.  trust me.

john jay @ 11.30.2018

p.s.  ***  btw, did it ever occur to you to ask, just where did these ballots come from?   who printed them?  who got them to the "voters?"    you figure it out.

in california, "democracy" means you vote, and then the dems count .... elections, bolshevik style ....

that little democrat joe stalin said it best, in "soviet democracy 101," when he observed that as between the voter and he who seeks power, it is the one who counts the votes who reigns supreme.

and so it goes in california, as more than "just a few" races for u.s. house seats, in which republicans who led when the votes were counted on election day, were later "resolved" in favor of democrats by "democratic" vote counters.

in california, "democracy" means you vote, and then the dems count the votes again, ... , bolshevik style.  little joe stalin, the little short democrat, is smiling in satisfaction, somewhere.  ask paul ryan, who of all people summoned up some gumption from somewhere, and commented on this.

in sum, california election officials are as dirty as any to be found in florida or nevada.  don't sell your guns, not just yet.

john jay @ 11.30.2018

the trouble w/ america ....

the trouble with america is that we are no longer a country with shared values, and a people,  but an empire comprised of disparate entities with no loyalty to the country, and no values to speak of except for contempt for honesty and integrity.  they are, in fact, loyal to nothing except gain.

the individual does not reign supreme, and, in fact, does not rule any longer.  we are governed by lotus eaters, vain, ignorant of history and science, and though it may sound a little strange to enunciate, insipid & superficial to the core: a herd rule by hysteria and vanity.***

simple as that.

john jay @ 11.26.2018  

***they believe that nothing is worth suffering or dying for, and, as a consequence, they also believe that nothing is worth living for, that life is nothing.  they get what they create, and they die in droves from suicide and drugs.  in this, they are at least consistent, for whatever that matters.  poor souls.  (they don't believe in that, either, sadly enough.)

mississippi .... what's it gonna be, maladroit or corrupt to the bone?

that's your choice, mississippi.   stupid, ... ,  or dishonest, venal and corrupt.

personally, i would go with merely stupid, and a little vacant looking.   espy is that, plus he is a dishonest and corrupt crook.**

some choice.  but, at least she will do as her leadership tells her.   and, that is repub.

john jay @ 11.26.2018

**and, a bit of a race baiter.  he'll follow the money, whoever pays the most.

mississippi senate run off ....

the republican wins.  that's my call.

republicans cast twice as many ballots, roughly speaking, as democrats in the initial vote.  i think democrats and the media tend to ignore this as they wax poetical over one stupid remark by the remaining republican.

the old adage, "she may be a stupid bitch, but she is our stupid bitch," will hold sway in this instance as it usually does.  if politicians suffered defeat for stupid remarks we would have precisely zero office holders.   zero, zilch, nada, nichts, none, ... , if you get the drift of it all.  all of this hullabaloo for one off-hand remark amounts to just dems and the media pissing into a pretty stiff breeze, in the light of reality.

dems/media grasping at straws.

john jay @ 11.20.2018 

 

update, 11.21.2018.  it looks as though the lady is doing her best to make me wrong in my prognosticating, insisting on making a race out of what should be a walk-away, if the media is to be trusted.   if the media is to be trusted.   they have lied at every turn trying to steal & influence votes & turnout votes,  here and there, (make that everywhere), and i have no doubt but that they are not to be trusted in their evaluation of anything having to do with this election cycle, or this specific election:  they have consistently lied about polling, and have consistently insisted dems were going to win in tight races, and it just hasn't happened in the senatorial races.  their forecasts in favor of democratic candidates just haven't materialized, for the most part.   so, can they be trusted about the mississippi senate run-off.  we'll see.  laughing.  end update.

 

brenda snipes in trouble .... she botched the recount ....

the fix was in.

exact brenda snipes botched the recount so badly, (getting caught red-handed counting illegal votes), that even the bastion of the leftist media, cnn, has declared the democrat for home the fix was operated dead in the water.

this is not the way a competent broward county thug is supposed to do things.   she will be axed.  not for attempting to run the fix, that has been in place for years, and the methodology well established.  no, he will get the axe to the back of the neck for botching it, and bringing to attention how it is run.

such is life.   big time demo one day, sleeping with your head on the curb the next day.  ain't this a great country.

john jay @ 11.17.2018

cali congress-person threatens to nuke citizens who assert constitutional rights .... yep, the second amendment discussion heats up ....

hey, the second amendment is right in the constitution, and it has been ruled by the supreme court of the u.s. that it is a personal and individual right pre-dating the constitution.  heller vs. washington, d.c..  you can look it up.

i haven't seen the whole thread/conversation, but the congress-fellow was apparently discussing the prospects of armed resistance to federal gun confiscation with another who was apparently advocating such resistance.  (get into a big boy argument, expect big boy responses, it must be conceded.  perhaps not-so-very-intelligent responses it must be observed, but you have expect the other fellow to swing back.  doncha.)

but, the fellow apparently advocating armed resistance to the gubment probably didn't expect what happened next.  the cali congress-entity got his umber up, and observed that any conflict between the gubment and private citizens, even if armed to the teeth, would be short-lived because the government has nukes.  and, at least this congress-idiot implied that he would be quite willing to use said nukes on any one who would resist the government, whether acting legally and in accord to the second amendment.  (john jay, first chief justice of the united states, alexander hamilton stalwart advocated of the federal bank, and james madison, future president of the united states argued in "the federalist papers" that such resistance to government tyranny was essential in preserving our rights and liberty.  never heard of 'em.  never read the federalist papers?  then you are part of the problem.)

now, the congress-person-with-the-long-dick which he had just stepped on quickly tried to back out of the plain import of what he'd just written, doing some serious backpedaling along the way, but, it does raise some interesting questions, doesn't it.  (including what they teach these numbskulls in the cali educational system.)

for instance.--

for instance, assume some serious resistance to a gubment offensive in beverly hills, home of movie stars, would the cali congress-person have the u.s. of a. drop a couple nukes on Beverly hills, or los angeles proper?   i think not, ... , why would he drop nukes on constituents.

but, say the gubment encountered some serious resistance to its efforts in milton freewater, oregon, not the home to movie stars and a serious concentration of snowflakes.  in short, not the congress-idiot's constituents, and not particularly well disposed to dumb asses such as himself.

would he have any hesitation in dropping a small nuke on milton freewater, just to serve as an object lesson to the more stubborn of the voting populace?  well, he said he would advocate that, didn't he?   and, if the twirp had the authority, no doubt he would do it.  after all, not many votes in the twirp's district up here in northeastern oregon.  (our governor, a good card carrying socialist, wouldn't mind very much, bless her little dwarfish heart.)

(well, mess with the mean doggie, and the mean doggie bites you on the ass, doesn't he?)

but, in milton freewater we have some snow flakes, and a couple democrats, and some others not as well endowed with smarts as the general run of the mill population.  it must be anticipated that congress-person-dumbass, he of the nuclear weapons aspirations, must anticipate incinerating a few innocents along with the gun nuts, he goes using nukes.

that prospect didn't seem to occur to him, nor cause him a second's hesitation in announcing his obviously dearly held fantasy.   and, yes, of course, being one of the cali congressional community, he backs nancy pelosi for speaker. 

do you have any doubt in your mind that this idiots pronouncements are simply asserting the most dearly held fantasies of pelosi and company.   we sub-humans in milton freewater, with our quaint notions that the english language, as set forth in the constitution, means exactly what it says, are simply the expendable deplorables so much beloved by democratic thinkers, the country over.

as joe stalin once observed, you cannot make an omelet without breaking a few eggs.  after all, dead is dead, and why get all worked up over a tactical nuke?

john jay @ 11.17.2018 

 

 

the trouble with this "country" is the north eastern seaboard .... it wields unjust & disproportionate power ....

the democratic party would not control anything were it not for the incredible political power wielded by the northeastern seaboard, those states from maine to west virginia.

together, they hold nearly 30% of the seats in the u.s. senate, and a goodly number of the seats in the house of representatives:  throw in the idiocy of the pacific coast states, and you have an absolute lock on power.  (there are 4 house seats in oregon and washington, total, not held by the democrats.  there are, by my count, 7 house seats in california not held by democrats.   this explains pelosi, waters, feinstein and several other idiots in power in the house.)

blue america holds the population, and generates about $9 trillion of the u.s. domestic product.   red america has no population, but feeds the country and generates about $9 trillion of the u.s. domestic product.   "blue america" has an absolute lock on deviancy, and "red america" controls the missionary position.

"blue america" has brenda snipes.  'nuff said.

john jay @ 11.16.2018

"you cain't have it back, i stole it from you fair and square" .... ima democrat, and i approved this message ....

a bumper sticker, spotted in my home town.--

"you cain't have it back, it's my country now, and i stole it from you fair and square."   a little tag off to the side said, "ima democrat, and i approved this message."   it had a picture of brenda snipes on it, grinning from ear to ear.  a little tag on the sticker, "union made," and "approved by the democratic national committee."  (see below.)

john jay @ 11.16.2018

p.s.   i think i am gonna publish & print the sticker.   first, some friends and i will get together at kelley's to debate the merits of getting rich, and then we will form a study committee.  once that is formed, we form one of those net thingies where people send you money to fund a market analysis, just like whatsherface ford did, to the tune of a couple million.  then we'll take advance orders, about $25.00 a pop, plus shipping and handling. if we ever get around to printing them up, and distributing them to people who have paid, we'll be well rewarded.  again.

hey, if they were stupid enough to do it for ford, they'll be stupid enough to do it for us:  after all, being good dems, they will figure it is true.  the "union made" and "dnc approved" should be sure fire hooks.  (see "see below," above.)

(do not despair:  there's still hope for us repubs.  we got out lawyered the last election cycles, but, this year, our lawyers struck early.   my lord, it has come to that, hasn't it?)  (i had a little thought that amused me greatly walking down the hill to the library, where i sit right now, and it was proof absolute that nevada is as dirty as any state, even more so than florida.  ask harry reid what happens to you, when you get cross-threaded with the boys with the crooked noses.  remember what happened to him when he walked into those three bathroom doors in succession, on the thin edge?  those doors pounded his face to a pulp, quite thoroughly.  could not have happened to a more deserving fellow.  i trust to a fair minded god that his face hurt as bad as it looked.)

diogenes sinopes, here, looking for a few honest democrats ....

not having much luck.  i've been looking a couple days, and so far i have two "provisionals," a "hanging chad," but no one person who has passed the canvessing requirements.  gonna have to get some fresh oil for the lantern, probably a replacement wick, too, if things keep going like this.   certainly, certainly, i should think i will come up with at least 11 or 12 honest democrats in the length and breadth of this great land!!!!  maybe oregon?   nah!! ---

you ever noticed how the dems always seem to come up with a couple hundred thousands ballots, delivered and counted at the last moment, just to get another dem over the top, as it were, unexpectedly and by the skin of his teeth.  odd, how those votes are always delivered to the election authorities in an old dusty delivery truck w/ no windows from "guido's printing, bait shop and mortuary services" in the dead of night?

florida.  georgia.  nevada.   arizona.   people in gaming states, and with a healthy experience providing housing to men with bent noses, always seeming to understand numbers and how to count them, ... , it comes from calculating odds, I guess.   eh?  the list goes on, but, none so egregious as the above.

the democrats are crooked, from top to bottom, in every state in the united states.   how can i say that?   well, i have irrefutable proof.--

have you seen one citizen of ordinary stripe, one democratic politician, one democratic holder of elective office, one talking head propaganda officer of any sort of news organization, get up on his or her two hind feet and say, "enough of this, I am embarrassed to the core of my being, and we as a party must clean up this horrible and corrupt system of counting votes that we have nurtured in places like broward county, florida.  this is intolerable that these conditions, which fester and rot in the body politic, are not excised from our politics, and i personally will not stand for it.  are we destined to be corrupt and venal for all eternity?"

nancy pelosi?  obama?  harry reid (now, that's a giggle, ain't it.)  lesley stahl?  the lady who fed hilary the questions that would be asked at the debates, donna brazil?  (she's a journalist, right?)  any of these virtuous stalwarts of democracy?

nope, and you ain't gonna.  the democrats regard cheating, corruption, bribery and lying as their political birthright, and they will do nothing about broward county and other bulwarks of democratic party strength.  after all, they deliver congressional seats with monotonous regularity, right in the wee hours of the night.  when it counts.

john jay @  11.15.2018

p.s.   assholes, thorough going assholes, from the first one to the last one, from the humblest citizen to the most exalted office holder.  to include ruth bader ginsburg, the old crone.  (she is as silent as any of them.)  they condone, and perpetuate, this cheating.