hat tip to carolyn e, who sent me the link to the following story w/ regard to hilary clinton's use of her private email for conducting the diplomacy of this country.
http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/235077-white-house-obama-emailed-to-clintons-private-account . at "the hill," the article "clinton used private email address with obama," by jordan fabian this date. the gist of the story is that obama has not been forthcoming about the extent of his email contact w/ clinton over her private address.
fancy that.
we must ask a simple, obvious question, one not addressed by the issue that it is against our domestic law for clinton and obama to have used private emails when conducting governmental business.
and, it is simply this.-- is there an intelligence service of any country in the world that could not have hacked into clinton's private email service, and thence into obama's? is it conceivable that russia, china, iran, iraq, the muslim brotherhood, israel, england or any fair to middling intell apparatus have/has not known exactly u.s. intentions in foreign policy, politics and military strategy while clinton was secretary of state?
maybe we can ask putin if the dumb bitch really intends to run for president. he ought to know as well as anyone.
john jay @ 03.09.2015
p.s. my guess is that the only souls in the world who didn't crack clinton's email security were the congressional republicans, who seem clueless in almost everything.
Clueless, or as has been witnessed over and over again, complicit?
Posted by: rightwingterrorist | March 10, 2015 at 05:51 AM
right wing:
guilty, in her own right.
i have continued to sort of follow this story, and while everyone quite rightly is concerned about clinton's clear violation of law, no one seems to be focusing upon the intelligence disaster all of this suggests.
clinton uses he private email, it goes: 1.)onto her server, and 2.)it goes to her isp or to the storage of the email provider.
there is not an intelligence agency in the world could not "crack" the "security" provided by a private email carrier, and i don't give a shit how "encrypted" it is by civilian/commercial standards. the security provided is child's play to a professional.
yet, no one, to the best of my reading knowledge has discussed this.
and, this my friends, is an intelligence and security disaster, implicating many things.
you think hillary never talked to the c.i.a. to defense intelligence agencies.
to obama and the white house.
hillary's email address alone could have served as a "way in" to such agencies.
tell me if i am mistaken, or exaggerating. and, if you do, back it up. i don't think that i am.
john jay
Posted by: john jay | March 10, 2015 at 11:34 AM
They (those in power) are all Alinskite adherents, whose main goal besides their own enrichment through power, is the stated destruction of America.
If, through no "fault of their own" they manage to allow access to the country's security apparatus, so much the better. In their view.
All upstanding members should therefore consider any and all actions perpetrated by those in power to be suspect of treason and dealt with accordingly.
They keep pushing.
Somebody(s) at some point in time will fire the next shot heard around the world.
Posted by: rightwingterrorist | March 12, 2015 at 07:42 AM