prologue. and, yes he also means to oppress those who support him, something those who support him will never figure out. they just think that they deserve to be taxed to death, and told to keep their mouths shut about it. "social justice," you know. "can't make an omelet without breaking eggs." and, in the light of "historical imperative," who can object to being an egg? yes, dear, it is why lefties are so malleable: those who design lefties made them that way, as part of the belief system. it is handier that way.
friends:
on of the nice things about being a "boutique blog," e.g., very small and read only by the nicest of people (even though i take you to task, eh?), is that you can kind of keep track of what is going on, and see which articles sustain interest over time.
one of my favorite posts, about obama's plans for a "civilian security force", "but what did he really mean? he means to have his own police force, a civilian army, that's what ..." continues to have vitality and draws hits, even though it was written in its last iteration august 31, 2009. and, it is a difficult article to "access," because i wrote it before fully mastering typepad's word processor and it is a jumble of typefaces, formats and fonts, with all sorts of "code" sneaking in from every place from which i drew material. and, my "flair" for punctuation and proof reading. laughing.http://wintersoldier2008.typepad.com/summer_patriot_winter_sol/2009/08/rough-notes-obamas-security-police-as-large-as-as-well-funded-as-well-equipred.html
but, sometimes one's difficult children gain your affection, too, eh?
so it was with some interest that i saw 3 or 4 hits from one of my favorite blogs, "not a sheep," and i went there to see what was going on. the long and the short of it being, that people are hitting a link to this website at "not a sheep" from an article published there september 1, 2009.
well, that is neat.
but, what is neater, i found links to three articles in that post that i had not read before, here and here and here, regarding some more aspects of obama's civilian army of which i was not aware. so, now i am aware of them, and you may link them as indicated above.
i am going to set the link to "not a sheep[maybe a goat]" out in full, as well as to the various iterations of my post, and the links above, so that if you remain curious about this subject you may easily access all those articles. i have also set out links before on the various places i set forth notes on things, and you may look at these, as well.
it is good to know that people are still reading these posts, here and there, because it means that people remain interested in this topic and vigilant of their rights and liberties, which obama and his devil spawn minions mean to take from us.
buy guns. buy ammo. by food and potables. and, automotive oils, and lamp oils to burn. you do have kerosene lamps & heaters, right? and, batteries, including auto batteries which may come in short supply if the "authorities" wish to restrict our ability to travel. and, hey, ... , shortages pop up, don't they.
john jay @ 06.24.2010
post at "not a sheep" -- http://notasheepmaybeagoat.blogspot.com/2009/09/barack-obamas-army.html sept. 1, 2009
post at "winter soldier" -- http://wintersoldier2008.typepad.com/summer_patriot_winter_sol/2009/08/but-what-did-he-really-mean-he-means-his-own-police-force-a-civilian-army-that-what.html august 31, 2009
the links to previous articles at "not a sheep" --
1.) http://notasheepmaybeagoat.blogspot.com/2008/10/sinister-plans-of-barack-obama.html october 26, 2008
2.) http://notasheepmaybeagoat.blogspot.com/2008/11/obamas-army.html november 7, 2008
3.) http://notasheepmaybeagoat.blogspot.com/2008/11/obamas-army-update.html november 17, 2008
the "notes" i compiled, on just how large as establishment the u.s. military is, and, therefore, just the size of the civilian army obama envisions the left having in its control in order to preserve itself. and, just whom does obama envision using it against to preserve himself? why, the u.s. military and us, that is who? seems obvious to me.
john jay @ 06.24.2010
p.s. i may go back and re-format that article, because now i know a little more about how to get rid of extraneous code. it may help may it more accessible, which would be good, yes? well, yes it would.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38706662/ns/world_news-the_new_york_times
Very interesting!
Posted by: Bill | June 25, 2010 at 12:46 AM