friends:
did you know that the chickenshits in congress do not publish their email addresses? it seems that the lazy do-nothing-bastards representatives do not want to be bothered with or troubled by reading the comments of their constituents.
in other words, they could give a shit about what you have to say, about anything.
well, who can blame the little wannabe dictators, anyhow.
people are so damned nettlesome, and belligerent, and prone to express their opinions when it comes to things. who in the hell needs that? what in the fuck will the people be expecting next, that they actually make recorded votes on the issues and legislation before them?
why, hell, sooner or later you dumb bastards will be expecting to actually have the right to vote for them to put them in congress, instead of just leaving it up to the greater wisdom of bill gates, george soros, bill ayers or bill maher. or, that they explain themselves to you. hell, who can be bothered with all that?
they do not publish e-mail. they have web-sites that accept email from their districts only. far be it for the lazy fucks to actually have to read what their “constituents” say.
i doubt these will be read by my illustrious representatives, but i have sent the following missives anyway, which i thought i would publish here, in case any of them are washington rebel readers.
friends, buy guns and buy ammo, and lay in a proper store of potables, canned veggies, canned meats, and other fat laden edibles. and, i would also suggest all the rice, flour, pastas and canned butter substitutes you can lay your hands on: butter flavored crisco will do. buy gallons and gallons of olive & soy oil, and more peanut butter than you could ever conceive of eating, in two lifetimes. and, do not forget dehydrated potatoes, … , mashed, au gratin or scalloped. ummers.
it is going to come to that.
john jay @ 03.15.2010
p.s. as for guns, if you are new to the area, don’t waste your time on a pistol or revolver for the first weapon. buy a marlin 336 in .30-30 caliber, or a mini 14 ranch rifle in 7.62x39mm russian or 6.8mm rem. spc.. if you have a little familiarity with weapons, a colt/bushmaster/dpms/stag/ruger in ar-15 is not a bad bet. i recommend the first two, because the “drill” in using the rifles is so open and apparent that a beginner can have them up and running in no time, … , not so with the ar-15/16 variants, which are a little finicky.
About 5,000 rounds of ammo per gun is a good rule of thumb.
but, the letters, to rep.’s pelosi, inslee (wash.) and hastings (wash.). idiots and lightweights, all. i print them in their entirety, although a little repetition is involved: i wanted you to have the full flavor of them.
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
_____________:
sent to pelosi, doc hastings, (my old congressman), and jay inslee (now on the "west" side of the state, and in congress, hastings beat him for the "central wash." slot.)
a small effort, and hopeless. inslee is worse than pelosi, and hastings is gutless.
john
to nancy pelosi --
dear speaker pelosi:
if the house of representative "passes" health care "reform" on the "slaughter solution," please be advised that such will be in derogation of your obligations as a member of congress to entered a recorded vote on the merits of such a "bill."
i believe the process patently unconstitutional.
i also believe it to be a usurpation of dictatorial power by the democratic party.
it will not stand. and, you incite civil war.
john jay
136 s.e. 8th avenue
milton freewater, oregon 97862
b.a. whitman college, political science, 1970
juris doctor, u. of oregon law school, 1977
to jay inslee --
dear representative inslee:
jay, i practiced law w/ you in yakima county, before you sought more hospitable climes for your politics on the wet side.
you court civil war with this "slaughter solution" maneuver. it is unwise in the extreme.
the below was forwarded to speaker pelosi's office. you will understand the flavor.
:::::::::::::::::::::
dear speaker pelosi:
if the house of representative "passes" health care "reform" on the "slaughter solution," please be advised that such will be in derogation of your obligations as a member of congress to entered a recorded vote on the merits of such a "bill."
i believe the process patently unconstitutional.
i also believe it to be a usurpation of dictatorial power by the democratic party.
it will not stand.
and, you incite civil war.
john jay
136 s.e. 8th avenue
milton freewater, oregon 97862
b.a. whitman college, political science, 1970
juris doctor, u. of oregon law school, 1977
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
p.s. it speaks volumes of the democratic party, and what it has become, that such a "method" would even be considered to pass a controversial bill like this. i am ashamed that our country has come to this. and, i am amazed that a lightweight like nancy pelosi could be elected speaker of the house: certainly an elevation of lust for power over every other consideration.
to doc hastings --
dear representative hastings:
this note was also sent to jay inslee, with whom i practiced law in yakima county before you ran him out of the district.
now, good sir, it is time you earned your salary and your keep.
you have been pretty silent on "health care" reform. it is now high time, give this "slaughter solution" nonsense, that you stand and be counted like a man.
as far as i am concerned, you are entirely worthless unless you do make a principled stand on this.
btw, i met you many years ago at a fund raiser and betty and paavo carlson's house in yakima, on one of your first runs for congress. i invoke the memory of their names to try and spur you to some political courage in this matter.
john jay
b.a. political science, 1970, whitman college
juris doctor, law, 1977, university of oregon
::::::::::::::::::::::::
dear representative inslee:
jay, i practiced law w/ you in yakima county, before you sought more hospitable climes for your politics on the wet side.
you court civil war with this "slaughter solution" maneuver. it is unwise in the extreme.
the below was forwarded to speaker pelosi's office. you will understand the flavor.
:::::::::::::::::::::
dear speaker pelosi:
if the house of representative "passes" health care "reform" on the "slaughter solution," please be advised that such will be in derogation of your obligations as a member of congress to entered a recorded vote on the merits of such a "bill."
i believe the process patently unconstitutional.
i also believe it to be a usurpation of dictatorial power by the democratic party.
it will not stand.
and, you incite civil war.
john jay
136 s.e. 8th avenue
milton freewater, oregon 97862
b.a. whitman college, political science, 1970
juris doctor, u. of oregon law school, 1977
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
p.s. it speaks volumes of the democratic party, and what it has become, that such a "method" would even be considered to pass a controversial bill like this. i am ashamed that our country has come to this. and, i am amazed that a lightweight like nancy pelosi could be elected speaker of the house: certainly an elevation of lust for power over every other consideration.
friends, buy guns and buy ammo, and lay in a proper store of potables, canned veggies . . .it is going to come to that.
If social collapse and/or civil war doesn't happen in a given period of time -- three years, five years, etc. -- will you reconsider the world view that lead you to this conclusion? What period of time would you suggest?
Posted by: Colin Laney | March 15, 2010 at 12:59 PM
colin:
john brown's raid on harpers ferry was in 1859, two short years until the first shots on ft. sumpter. you may view brown's raid as a culmination, of sorts, of "bloody kansas," where he picked up his skills.
the "kansas-nebraska" act was passed in 1854, pushed through congress by a corrupt democratic administration whose leader was stephen a. douglas, he who defended slavery in the "lincoln-douglas" debates in 1858, just a year before john brown took his sons and other followers into harpers ferry.
harriet beecher stowe wrote "uncle tom's cabin" in 1852, which inflamed abolitionist sentiment and the abolitionist movement to a fever pitch, and did much to fan the antagonism between north and south.
the missouri compromise was passed 1820, and the fugitive slave act was considered in 1850, and these matters highlighted the tension of a constitutional provision enacted in 1789 with the passage of the constitution.
which of these matters are you willing to say did not contribute to the making of the civil war? where do you draw the line at the "start of hostilities?" the firing of the shot at fort sumpter? the first battle of bull run?
i can tell you, if the democrats pass "health care reform" on the strength of this "slaughter solution," it will prove an incendiary situation? what will the democrats pass next? when do we cease bothering to cast ballots to see politicians elected to office.
let me suggest this.--
scoff all you wish. it remains yet a free country. but, buy your guns and ammo, and chose your sides, because i think the country headed for a big blow. health care. abortion. a free versus a totalitarian political state. and, friend colin, understand, some of us don't view the prospect of a little dust up with much trepidation. we rather welcome the chance. read your bible. moses reminded the house of israel that it should purge evil from its midst, as the occasion called for it. read your jefferson: the full text of his "tree of liberty" letter is found in this blog.
john jay
p.s. lets put $5.00 on within 10 years, o.k.? you wanna pick a winner? you wanna make it a $10.00 bill on me and my side?
p.s. would you have asked harriet beecher stowe to have "reconsidered her world view" five years after the publication of "uncle tom's cabin"? would you have asked frederick douglass to have "reconsidered his world view," after he said:
"find out just what any people will quietly submit to and you have the exact measure of the injustice and wrong which will be imposed on them." frederick douglass
i will not quietly submit to socialism imposed upon me by the "slaughter solution." i will fight to impose any such usurpation of the law.
don't insult me by asking me reconsider a world view that i have put together over 45 years of reflection on totalitarian systems and the totalitarian ideology, and the impulse behind it. you are silly in the extreme to question the conviction behind my thoughts. just plum assed silly, friend colin.
douglass also said this, which you might profit to reflect upon:
"i didn't know i was a slave until i found out i couldn't do the things i wanted."
i believe that you are never too old to learn. and, when the friendly local acorn representative comes to your door, with a pitchfork to jam up your butt, you may have cause for reflection and a "learning moment," in spite of yourself. but, don't ask me to reconsider my world view. laughing. you piss in the wind.
you might be better served by alertness, rather than the smugness which denies that which happens before your very eyes.
Posted by: john jay | March 15, 2010 at 01:43 PM
Thought I'd let you you know that you can email any of the congressional representatives by going to their website. I have done so and received several personal email and US Mail responses from mine.
You are also free to call and voice your opinion. Or, if you don't like that option, you can many times meet with them personally if you show up and ask.
Hope that's helpful! Have a great day!
Posted by: Jazmine Tucker | April 18, 2010 at 10:44 AM