summer patriot, winter soldier

the delegates to the electoral college ..... not their first time to the rodeo ..... they know what biden did .....

forward:  yes, i am counting on the electoral delegates to remember their supreme loyalty, and that is to their country, and the laws, & legal obligations, and to a way of life that respects tradition, honesty and personal rectitude.   without those things, we fall.  plain and simple.

and, don't forget, kamala harris was in on the fix, as well.  kamala harris and joe biden are equally filthy.  period.

the only electoral college delegate i have ever met was howard lamb, since deceased, from rural nebraska.  he was a successful farmer/rancher, and had been at one time a nebraska state senator, and a good friend to a u.s. senator from that state.

he was a savvy and astute man in many things, not the least of them being politics and the political lessons he had learned over a full lifetime.

he was a delegate to the electoral college in the famous bush-gore race, that of the florida "hanging chad" brouhaha.   the electoral college convention was not his first time to the rodeo.   which is to say that he was thoroughly versed in matters political, and in the issues to be confronted by the convention.

his son, a yakima, washington attorney named phil lamb had invited me to nebraska to go deer hunting on the family lands, prior to the electoral college, as it worked out.   one morning as we were having breakfast his father, howard, got a phone call from reporter in london, england.   this reporter inquired of howard lamb if he would vote for george bush when the convention got down to its business, or if there was any chance that he would "kick over the traces," and vote for al gore.

howard lamb was possessed of a sly & droll sense of humor.  he told the reporter over the phone, that when al gore's people offered him plane tickets (to some remote place), a false identity and a suitcase full of money he would think about it.  there was silence for a while.   and, then, howard lamb explained to him what would happen to a republican from nebraska who would abandon his pledge to the people, and the republicans, of his state.  after that, there were some perfunctory comments from both before they said good bye.

the point is this.  the delegates are party loyalists, not likely to abandon those loyalties.   but, they are also extremely well versed in politics, in the politics of their parties, and extremely knowledgeable about current events.

in my opinion they know, all of them, full well who and what joe biden is, and what he has been.   and, they are convinced in their own minds, each and every man and woman, that joe biden peddled influence while vice-president of the united states, and took money while in office selling that influence.  they know full well that he, and the democratic party, and the mass media tried to steal this election from donald john trump.

if they were like howard lamb, experienced in and knowledgeable about politics, they would not be impressed by joe biden.  period.  now, we get to the crux of the matter.

"he may be a stupid son of a bitch, but he is my stupid son of a bitch."  and old, hoary, but still serviceable maxim in matters political.  to this, factor in the fact that they know he is a crook, a seller of influence, and that he tried to steal the presidential election  ....  this is of slightly greater magnitude than trying to get an old friend a job with the county clerk's office.

in my judgment, which may or may not be faulty, i do not think a single delegate, except for the most rabid ideologue, is likely to be eager to vote for joe biden for president of the united states.  this is why john brennan, as crazy a son of a bitch to come down the pike in a while, does not want to see this election go to the electoral college, and is actively promoting a coup to prevent it.   this is why joe biden is trying to pressure a concession from donald trump, which he is likely to get when hell is cover by 6 feet of ice.

i don't think joe biden will carry the electoral college.

and, each and every revelation about the fix that was put on the popular vote by computer fraud, ballot harvesting, and people voting from the grave will make it less likely.  so biden and the media are putting the bum's rush on the public "to get this over with."   but, with each sordid revelation about biden, it is less likely that he will prevail in the electoral college.

howard lamb was a loyal republican, but if he were a democrat to this years electoral college, he wouldn't have voted for joe biden with a gun to his head.  no blandishment about party, or this or that, could have forced him to vote for that filthy bastard, ... , a filthy bastard who sold his country, and tried to subvert and usurp the political process by voter fraud to steal an election.

this is why it is important to keep hammering away at the fraud, the phony facade, of a crooked & cynical politician before the electoral college convenes.  we need to remind the delegates what this country is about, and remind them that joe biden reflects absolutely nothing about what is good about that.

they know what joe biden attempted.   they know who he is.  and those things will influence the vote.

john jay @ 11.16.2020

donald trump not the first to complain about eletronic machines switching votes, falsely tabulating votes ..... 3 democratic senators, 1 house member did it first, in december 2019 .....

https://headlineusa.com/democrats-warned-dominion-voting-systems-errors-threatened-integrity-of-our-elections/...... /headlineusa.com/democrats-warned-dominion-voting-systems-errors-threatened-integrity-of-our-elections

"democrats warned dominion voting system's error threatened 'integrity of our elections'" by contributing editor, november 16, 2020.

democrat senators ron wyden (d-ore), amy klobuchar (d-minn), elizabeth warren (-mass.) and house member marc pocan (d-    ) wrote an open letter to the owner ofdominion voting machines that reports of: 1.)"machines switching votes" 2.)"reporting improbable results," and 3.)"containing vulnerabilities" (to no doubt hacking over the internet) were serious problems that needed to be addressed by the company.

donad trump, still president of the united states, has complained of these very same things in his assertion that this election has been stolen from him electronically.

how can the democrats accuse him of trying to delay the election results from being reviewed, for the very reasons established by wyden, warren, klobuchar and pocan in joint hearing before them and the congress.

the article i've cited carries a long list of dominion and other voting machine errors.  the post immediately before this one has described how dominion and es&s systems are vulnerable to hacking, and subterfuge over the internet.--  it is manifestly obvious that hackers can program dominion and es&s machines over the net to switch votes, and falsely tabulate votes, or simply "disappear them."  a few key strokes by a hacker can deliver an election to someone who has lost.

and, this, exactly as senator wyden, warren, klobuchar and representative pocan have set forward in their committee finding, and their letter to dominion is precisely of which trump complains.  they cannot gainsay him for precisely what they have themselves described.

tomorrow i will return to the letter described herein, and to the work of the committee described in the new york review of books article, and i will set forth each incident in which dominion and es&s machines have cheated candidates in elections, and have cheated the voting public.

john jay @ 11.17.2020

report says election "pristine" ..... on the other hand*** democrat reports says election are vulnerable, because voting machines are suspect ....

https://www.nybooks.com/daily/2019/12/17/how-new-voting-machines-could-hack-our-democracy/

i copied this article, and tried to "publish" it, but could not because typepad blocked it.  typepad is google, and google is in on the fix of the 2020 presidential election.

the article is in the new york review of books, published december 17, 2019 by jennifer cohn.  it is an information rich article discussing the troubles with voting machines, to include how they can be hacked through computers on the net.  such hacking can instruct them to switch votes.

note:  the information in the new york review of books article merely confirms the hacker capability outline in "sandworm," by andy greenberg, discussed in these pages earlier.  read the book, and read ms. cohn's article as well, as she details many instances of voting machine irregularities and glitches occurring in u.s. elections.  john jay

at some time and effort, i am going to hand type information in the article, to include the efforts by democratic united states senators ron wyden (d-ore), amy klobuchar (d-minn) and elizabeth warren (d-mass), and including u.s. house of representatives member marc pocan (d-wis.)

the excerpt from the article.--

[my emphasis, bold & italics added:jjj]

"election security expert professor alex j. halderman of the university of michigan agrees that election management systems 'sometimes are connected to the internet or the data that is programmed into them passes through an internet-connected system, ' so that 'we're just one or two hops away from an online attacker.'  as he testified to the house appropriations subcommittee last year 'hackers who compromise an election management system can .... spread a voter-stealing attack to a large number of machines.'  moreover, he says that:

a small number of election technology vendors and support contractors program and operate election management systems used by many local governments.  the largest of these [,] services over 2,000 jurisdictions spread across 34 states.  attackers [hackers] could target one or a few of these companies and spread an attack to election equipment (including bmd's) that serve millions of voters.

last week democratic senators elizabeth warren, ron wyden and amy klobuchar and representative mark pocan (democrat of wisconsin) announced that they had opened an investigation into the 'vulnerabilities and shortcomings of election technology industry with ties to private equity.'  the reason the issue of private equity matters is that the two top vendors of these ballot marking machines, election systems software (es&s) and dominion voting, account for more than 80% of u.s. election equipment.  they thus hold between them a near monopoly on the industry, and their form of ownership means there is no way of discovering the details of who really owns them or even whether they are legitimate competitors."

now, we are back to me.  it is also obvious from the above that es&s and dominion would have almost instant access to all of those machines via the internet, and could program them to operate as any inserted code would direct.

it also means that any statement from dominion to the effect of the purity of the election cycle is just about worthless, and self serving on its face.

it also means, given their resources, that es&s and dominion could have rigged this election in the favor of joe biden with consummate ease, to include vote harvesting and vote transfer between candidates.

now, in an earlier post i said that the joint c.i.s.a. and dominion "communique" on the election was "distressing."   and, it was.   because, it simply raises the suggestion that c.i.s.a. is/was/shall be found to have been part of the fix.  from the beginning.

john jay @ 11.17.2020

"it all depends on whose ox is being gored" ..... and, whose ox is doing the goring .....

my old friend & ex-brother-in-law always was one to keep a proper perspective on things, and he was wont to note, "it all depends on whose ox is being gored."  this meant, of course, that you had to understand who was injured, and who inflicted the injury.

and, when examining the various reports, accounts and associations with & of the reporting party, you had to keep firmly in view who was injured, and who was reputed as inflicting the injury.

perspective is everything.

and, so it is.  on the one hand, the owner of the voting machines involved in the election, and on the other hand, the reports on the deficiencies alleged in the voting machines, and the deficiencies and flaws in a given election, and associated election reports.

so, we have three u.s. senators highly critical of the dominion machines prior to the 2020 presidential elections, and defending them now, and president trump and others (to include me) saying that fraud was effected in the election through manipulation of the machines, and those of other makes and manufacture.

one thing you have to keep in mind, in view of the russian hacking of the ukraine and estonia, that hackers have absolutely no trouble in breaking into and manipulating such machines and their computer controls.  to argue otherwise is, well, idiotic.  it is to argue against the reality of what happens every day, and what has happened.

and, keep in mind, snowden and others leaked some of the most sophisticated hacking tools devised by the u.s. nsa, and cia agencies onto the general internet, for anyone to use.  the russians have used nsa worms and malwares to bedevil the ukrainians, and others.

so, it is not open to serious contention that it has not, and could not happen.   the only question is did it, and can concrete evidence competent to be admissible at trial in a court of law available to those who attack the election results.

and, there is the ancient doctrine in the law, that being "res ipsa locquitur."  "the thing speaks for itself."

we have eyes to see, and when we see 100,000 votes show up for one with no votes for another in the vote tally, the suggestion of fixing the vote suggests, and largely proves, itself.  this happened.  it has not been explained.

as for the cisa report.--  it is inherently suspect to me, and largely self serving for an agency supposedly monitoring these things.   and, it comes from the u.s. intel end of things, and the intel people for one reason or another, and none of it explained, having a raging hard on against donald trump.   i don't trust them, as their people, john brennan, james comey and andrew mccabe are proven liars.  there is the little coup attempt, ongoing and continuous, being waged by them and obama, and to my mind, if there is election fraud, they are not very far away from having perpetuated it.

john jay @ 11.17.2020

a most disturbing report ..... dominion denies voting irregularities ....

https://www.dominionvoting.com/

dominion voting systems denies any voting irregularities, and says its machines were secure during the election.  it denies that its machines were interfered with.

query:  why would a federal watchdog agency put out a joint communique with the dog, saying the dog has been nice, when the dog has chicken feather and entrails dripping from its jaws?  just asking.   it occurred to me this morning, that this is a bit odd.  does it seem odd to you?   is the job of a regulatory agency to prop up the reputation of the regulated?  11.17.2020.  this occurred to me this morning.  it didn't occur to me at 2.00 a.m. this previous morning.  mea culpa.

it issued this statement --

"According to a Joint Statement by the federal government agency that oversees U.S. election security, the Department of Homeland Security's Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA): "There is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised."  The government & private sector councils that support this mission called the 2020 election "the most secure in American history."  https://www.dominionvoting.com/

the attacks that i have made, and that others have made, especially the trump campaign, against the security of the election are directly contradicted by the dominion report.   most troubling, most disturbing, is the statement by cisa (cybersecurity & infrastructure security agency) that no voting systems deleted or lost votes, or changed them [presumably from one candidate to another, as i have asserted.]

there is no middle ground here.   absolutely none.

i do not know that i am reassured or mollified.  nor am i compelled by cisa's statement, given the recent history of the u.s. intelligence community in being involved in coup efforts against donald trump, e.g., the roles of john brennan, james comey and andrew mccabe in spring the false "steele dossier."   this "document" was an outright fabrication.

there are, moreover, spikes in the vote, as recorded by the new york time graphic analysis and records of the elections that are very hard to explain away, or make vanish by reassuring statements.  [very plainly, these "spikes" and "glitches" suggest tampering, & vote stealing, plain and simple.]   dominion hardly has a spotless record in these matters.   and, there are single vote "ballots", both electronic and paper, that came through with only one candidate marked, that being joe biden, and no votes at all for trump.

only litigation in the federal courts will settle this, and only detailed analysis of servers as recovered by investigators examining code, if it can be found, will settle the issue.  that, and "trial before god," as was said in other ages.

these issues appear only resolvable by physical evidence and examination of the machines involved.

i am skeptical of the dominion report.   deeply skeptical.

and, the fact is that hackers have penetrated very elaborate security measures in the past, and that windows and windows word remain deeply susceptible of hacking computers that control machines.  only detailed examination is able to discover the hacking code, and sometimes it takes months to identify the hackers.  see, "sandworm" by andy greenberg, discussed often in these pages.

this issue is deeply disturbing, and compromises the security of the nation, and faith in its institutions.  this goes to the heart of the republic.

john jay @ 11.17.2020

the duty of an elector (to the electoral college convention) to have an ethical consideration of politics ..... partisanship is subordinate to one's duty as an ethical person .....

in a few short days the electoral college will convene and consider the certified election results of the several states, and then cast their ballots for the election of the president of the united states.  they will not do so as though they were living in a bubble, or a glass house, or as though they were oblivious to current events.

no one could be ignorant of the influence peddling accusations leveled against joe biden and his "family crime syndicate.  no person, no elector, will cast his vote oblivious to the fact that massive voter fraud has taken place, and is likely still taking place, during this 2020 presidential election.

certain people will ask them to do precisely that, and to cast their ballots as though none of this ever happened, and they will advance all sorts of high blown "opinion" as to why this is proper.  among the more seductive of these arguments will be "the peace, unity and harmony" gambit.  (i don't need to set it out, you know how it goes  ....  but it asserts these values are highest of all, and dictate one's actions to the exclusions of all courses of conduct.)

well, it has a certain appeal, to be sure.

but, let me ask these few simple questions.--

how should a person react if another walks up to him, and spits in his face, and urinates on his shoes, and tells him that he has no right to be a catholic?  or a jew?  we have, most of us, been inculcated with the belief that we should not strike another.  i would suggest that at times one's dignity interests override that instruction.

how should a person act when woken from his sleep in the dark of night to noises in his young daughter's bedroom, and walks in to find an intruder there, preparing to sodomize his child?  should he obey the stricture that thou shalt not kill.  i would suggest, no, i will tell that i would shoot such a person, without a moment's hesitation, and i would continue shooting him until there were no wiggle left in his body, and i would let him "have" another behind the ear for good measure.

how should a person react when a group of people, in the dead of night, break into his home and attempt to rob his liberty, his rights, his very way of life, and sully and negate his right to vote, his right of self determination?  and, laugh at you with contempt for your protestation, and assault you most grievously when you raise an objection?   just how would you deal with it?

well, i will tell you, i would view him on an equal moral and ethical plane as the rapist.  i might not shoot him.   but, i can sure as hell tell you, i would not vote for him, not for all the rice in china.   vote for a person who would usurp my franchise, who would rob me of the right to participate in my own governance, who would destroy a citizenry.

i would not vote for him.   i would not endorse any election which was corrupted by fraud, or even deceit.  nor would i be dissuaded from my decision by some facile bullshit that by falsifying the vote he & his confederates were serving a higher value.  (the least of which would be "historical imperative.)  when it comes to preserving a civil society, there is no higher value than the integrity of the vote, and anyone who tells you differently, merely seeks to gull you, and render your vote a nullity.   and, quite frankly, to render you a nullity.

john jay @ 11.16.2020

 

were i sydney powell, i would go after john brennan, tooth & claw .....

john brennan is exceedingly nervous.  he is either drinking, taking too many prescription, or scared witless about the prospect of being tied into this vote fraud.--   why else would a man, used to working in the shadows and discretely come out in public and recommnd to vice-president pence that he lead a coup to depose donald trump, and serve out trump's remaining term and make nice nice with joe biden.

there is the possibility that brennan is just bombastic and full of himself or mentally unbalanced, but i am voting for scared and panicked. 

scared and panicked is a good thing in a defendant who is targeted by a prosecutor.  i would charge him, put him in custody as a flight risk, and a threat to an ongoing investigation and the president of the united states, and then i would work him over.   he obviously is a little nutty on the topic of donald trump.

put him in jeffery epstein's old bunk.   with epstein's old "roommate."   and, put him on suicide watch.  and, on bread and water.

and, then sydney powell should just let him know what he is looking at in terms of prison time, and what she will recommend to the sentencing judge.  remind brennan that president trump appointed 223 judges to the federal bench  ....  there ought to be a couple in the federal district in which he is to be tried.

and, i would dig up everything i could, and charge him with that, as well.  watch the defense bar eat him alive with legal fees  ....  and, see who is paying them.  (follow the money, that sort of thing.)  and, note who visits, ... , chat with them.   he won't like that, at all.

and, just work the son of a bitch.   he will not be used to "that end of things."   offer him nothing, until he inquires if any offer is forthcoming.  and, when he asks, offer him nothing, again.  he won't like that.  at all.

i exaggerate.   but, you get the point.  but, where is epstein's old bunkie?   he's got to be floating around somewhere, just lifting weights and getting stronger.

john jay @ 11.15.2020

the next trick for the donald and sydney powell, is to see if they can come up w/ any communications between thieves .....

it would appear that new york times election vote graphs will prove the vote dumping, and i am hoping that code and instructions are recoverable in servers, machines, etc.

what would be icing on the cake would be if trump & company can come up with any communications between the perps.   before the election, during the voting, post-election, it would all be relevant to the crime(s).   and, would be evidence and persuasion of guilt.

it would appear from the n.y. times record keeping that perhaps more than one entity was involved in instructing the voting machines/computers in how to tabulate the vote.

in michigan, it appears that they underestimated trump's ability to garner votes in that state, so a massive theft from trump and attribution to biden had to be done at 6.30 a.m. november 4.   somebody finally noticed, and took a chance no one would notice.

in pennsylvania, everyone new it would be relatively close, so a continuous and gradual theft & dump took place.  but, even trying to be careful, they chose to do it at 6,000/12,000 vote infusions into the biden vote count.   and, this was noticeable, and a statistical aberration.  (benford, anyone.)

in pa., the "steal"/theft was gradual, probably according to plan so i would think they did not communicate very much.    but, in mi., it appears that maybe a "panic button" of sorts was pushed, and that might

have required some sort of direct instruction to the people manning the computers controlling the voting machines doing the tabulation.

given the various parties's connection with the chinese  ....   the biden's, the harris's, the pelosi's, i have reached the conclusion (hardly carved in stone) that the chinese did the basic hacking, and infiltration into the machine control.   but, they would have needed outposts, and people controlling the computers, on the ground, to have made decisions like dumping 100,000 votes at a time.

this is "where" i would look.   for talk and chatter.   obviously, it is easier said than done.  where to look, in particular, and at whom.  i will leave that to sydney powell, ... , she seems pretty resourceful to me, and quite capable of twisting an arm or two to get the information she needs.  so, twist away, sydney.

psychologically, of course.   but, you know, people do fall and break fingers, and the like.

john jay @ 11.15.2020

and, where pray tell, is the n.y. times integrity? ....

and, where pray tell, is the n.y. times integrity?   they had the data, they compiled it.

and why have they said not a damned word about it?  not a chirp.

john jay @ 11.15.2020

 

p.s.  i think that by covering this up they are complicitous in the fraud, that they are principles and/or accomplices to the fraud and its various components.   i think that sydney powell should prosecute the entire editorial board, the editors in charge of the story, the reporters, and the owners of the paper, and throw them all in jail.  bottom bunks.

where is the new york times election tracking data for pennsylvania? .....

where, pray tell?

john @ 11.15.2020

p.s.   rhetorical question.   see the doug ross journal, home page, for the same thing in penn-a.   votes dumped for/to biden in quite improbable numbers throughout the election.

if this is not righted, it is nigh time for civil war.

new york times .... massive data dump to obama at 6.30 a.m. .... electronic, they had to come from somewhere, no documents to phoney ....

no documents to phony.   the only way to make up the vote, was to steal it from trump.  it is just that damned simple.

the only logical explanation is that they saved 100,000 votes from trump without tabulating, and then dumped them to biden  ....   the way i look at it, a swing of 200,000 votes to biden.   that how a lead of 100's of thousands turns into a "behind," not made up.   the stealing was continuous, so as not to be noticed, but they had no choice but to do it all at once, when they thought no one was looking.

(a strange occurrence, that the new york times record keeping confirms it.)

it occurred at 6.30 a.m.    the new york times data sheet reflected it, but the new york times reporters, and none of the networks, including fox, noted it.   the fix was in, in other words.

computer and vote machine people, broadcasters and print media, and elections officials.   a massive corrupt conclusion, and a grand design to steal an election from trump, and from us, the american people.   those assholes, and there is no other word for it, are trying to steal our republic, and our votes, right from under our very  noses.

buy powder, buy guns, buy components, and stay fucking pissed.  we may need all of that.

john jay @ 11.15.2020