summer patriot, winter soldier

nypd going public w/ the weiner's emails .... clintons implicated in vast criminal undertaking, pedophilia ....

hat tip "c."  

http://www.teaparty.org/breaking-bombshell-nypd-blows-whistle-new-hillary-emails-money-laundering-sex-crimes-children-child-exploitation-pay-play-perjury-196573/#.WBuN-nUVAV4.email 

update, 11.05.2016.   see as well, this article by sylwin duke which contains some really fine writing on this topic.   very good writing.  http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/crime/item/24549-nypd-source-weiner-laptop-has-enough-evidence-to-put-hillary-away-for-life?src=ilaw .   end update.

update, 01.18.2017. see as well a post which followed the instant post, about a twitter by donald trump openly linking the clinton's to the issue of child pornography and pedophilia in the caribbean.   http://wintersoldier2008.typepad.com/summer_patriot_winter_sol/2016/11/trump-email-provides-linkage-to-clintons-w-convicted-child-abductor-clintons-human-trafficking-.html . end update.  

i am putting the entire article linked above under a page break, but the quote below gives the gist of it.  the nypd has copies of the emails and other information taken off anthony weiner's/huma abedin's computer.  and, if the fbi and justice department don't release its contents, the nypd will, so disgusted are they but what they found on it.   what they found were links to child sex, pedophilia, money laundering, influence peddling and r.i.c.o. [racketeering violations], and connections with saudi arabia.  this latter may have implications with i.s.i.s. and terrorism.

hillary clinton will never draw breath as president of the united states.  she is toast.   this excerpt from the post linked above:

breaking bombshell: nypd blows whistle on new hillary emails  ......

nypd detectives and a nypd chief, the department’s highest rank under commissioner, said openly that if the fbi and justice department fail to garner timely indictments against clinton and co- conspirators, nypd will go public with the damaging emails now in the hands of fbi director james comey and many fbi field offices.

“what’s in the emails is staggering and as a father, it turned my stomach,” the nypd chief said. “there is not going to be any houdini-like escape from what we found. we have copies of everything. we will ship them to wikileaks or i will personally hold my own press conference if it comes to that.”

the nypd chief said once comey saw the alarming contents of the emails he was forced to reopen a criminal probe against clinton.  [bold & underline added:jjj]

http://www.teaparty.org/breaking-bombshell-nypd-blows-whistle-new-hillary-emails-money-laundering-sex-crimes-children-child-exploitation-pay-play-perjury-196573/#.WBuN-nUVAV4.email

“People are going to prison,” he said.

if this breaks in time, there is nothing in this world that hillary clinton can do to salvage her election campaign.   even if she is elected president, she will not serve one day as president of the united states.  as president elect, and before she is sworn in, she has no ability to assert any sort of immunity.

in a matter that may or may not be related to this, clinton's running mate has backed away from any allegation that the fbi's relaunching of the clinton's email investigation is ill-brought.   he says, quite clearly, that it is his opinion that the fbi announcement was not calculated to change the outcome of the election, allowing the inference that he believes comey's now-famous letter was dictated by the circumstances.  said kaine:

virginia sen. tim kaine said on a taping of alan colmes' fox news radio show that comey's letter to congress last friday was 'highly unusual' and 'cryptic' but he wouldn't follow in clinton's footsteps and suggest the law enforcement official was helping the republican ticket.

'i don’t think he is trying to influence the outcome of the election,' kaine said, according to politico [live link removed:jjj] 'i don’t question his integrity, but I do have serious questions about the judgment demonstrated by this.' 

read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3902822/Tim-Kaine-splits-Clinton-attack-FBI-corruption-probe-woes-mount-saying-James-Comey-NOT-trying-influence-election.html#ixzz4OzcE2YDq

Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

kaine has wisely distanced himself from clinton's position in this, and, at this very critical juncture, this has to be seen as distancing himself from clinton personally.   he knows the trouble she is in, and that not only are her chances of being elected president rapidly disappearing, but that she also faces lengthy prison terms as the umbrella of luck she has enjoyed for years erodes & vanishes.

she is toast.  and, in a few days, she is going to be quite broken, quite lonely, and quite isolated.    she will have only bill and huma to comfort her, (probably in the same bed.)  with any luck she will be gone from our public stage, probably for a couple minimum 20 terms.

i am gonna publish the entire post about the new york city police announcement, but, under the page break: it would take up too much space, as i have another related post i want to put up.  you can either go under the page break, or you can go to the web site following the two links supplied in this post.   either way, things have taken a very bad turn for hillary clinton, and she richly deserves it.

beats the hell outta me ....

i don't write much, i am getting old and tired, disabused and don't care very much.   but, occasionally i get a little spike in my readership.  (i remain small potatoes.)   i have no idea where it comes from, or why.  and, it has to do w/ older posts, some i haven't thought of for years.   why? 

beats the hell outta me.

john jay @ 12.12.2018

"car and driver's" road test scoring ....

the evaluator's scoring, all learned at the brenda snipes school of counting.  just "harvest" the votes when you need 'em.

john jay @  12.03.2018

319 square miles that rule the united states .... (or would, were it not for the electoral college) ....

this from an email i received from a friend, the article without attribution or authorship.  (if any one can supply same, please do so.) nonetheless, the article is very timely, and conveys a truth that cannot be denied.   and that is, were it not for the electoral college new york city, san francisco and los angeles would control the politics of the united states, absolutely.

de facto, de jure, and with an absolute grip.   whoever controlled/controls the politics of these "nations" would run the united states with an iron fist, not just by the influence of persuasion and logic, but in absolute fact.

follows the article.--

 

"subject:  319 square miles.

.....

in their infinite wisdom, the united states founders created the electoral college to ensure the states were fairly represented.  why should one or two densely populated areas speak for the whole of the nation?

the following list of statistics has been making the rounds on the internet.  it should finally put an end to the argument as to why the electoral college makes sense.

but share this.  it needs to be widely known and understood.

'there are 3,141 counties in the united states.

trump won 3,084 of them.

clinton won 57.  there are 62 counties in new york state.  

trump won 46 of them.

clinton won 16.

clinton won the popular vote by approx. 1.5 million votes.

in the 5 counties that encompass nyc [new york city] (bronx, brooklyn, manhattan, richmond & queens) clinton received well over 2 million more votes that trump.  (cliinton only won 4 of these counties: trump won richmond.)

therefore, these 5 counties alone, more than accounted for clinton winning the popular votes of the entire country.***  [read "new york city" for "these counties alone.".]

these counties comprise 319 square miles.

when you have a country that encompasses almost 4 million square miles of territory, it would be ludicrous to even suggest that the vote of those who inhabit a mere 319 square miles should dictate the outcome of a national election.

large, densely populated democrat cities (nyc, chicago, la, etc.) do not and should not speak for the rest of our country.  [to the exclusion of our voices!!]

and ...  it's been verified and documented that those aforementioned 319 square miles are where the majority of our nation's problems foment.  [chicago has strict gun control, yet suffers enormous gun deaths among young blacks.... do you want chicago's gun policies to run the country?]

well worth the 39 seconds to read?  now, please pass it on.'"

 

the above article raises sobering concerns.  and, i have raised like concerns in previous articles relating to the disproportionate power held by the states of new york , pennsylvania and virginnia along the northeastern seaboard, accompanied & enhanced & multiplied by the piss-ant states of rhode island, massachusetts, connecticut, new jersey, vermont and new hampshire in new england, .... , along with maryland, delaware along the chesapeake bay,  their numbers in office constituting nearly one third of the house and senate in the united states congress.

there is no political excuse for the power wielded in the senate & house by the "piss-ant states," except for the accident of our political history.  as a practical and practicable matter, there is no excuse for these small entities to even exist as separate states, as they are little more than extensions of new york and pennsylvania (and of virginia, to a lesser degree.)  they have little productive power, their domestic law being hostile to economic production, yet they would tell the rest of us how to manage such matters:  the only thing they produce is political arrogance.  (understand who & what bernie sanders is  ...  he wants everything, he wants it produced where you live, and he wants you to clean up the slag piles in your backyard, as he basks in the product of your labor.  simple as that.)

yet, as the above article suggests, these circumstances and the "political numbers" generated thereby,  confers enormous influence upon & to new york and pennsylvania (and their vassal states) in the political affairs of the country.

truly, the only thing that stands between we citizens and a tyranny of these populous states on the northeastern seaboard in the electoral college.

it is the only thing.   

it is certainly not the democratic party and its lust for absolute power over the affairs of the nation.  their lust for power confers no restraint in their dealings with us.

think about it.  chuck shumer and nancy pelosi, the guardians of your liberty.  think about it.   

john jay @ 12.03.2018

p.s.  as john adams said, "may the chains sit lightly upon your shoulders."

in brief, in california, the election is not over until the democrat wins .... simple as that ....

simple as that.  7,000 votes behind?  if you are a democrat, you just "harvest" ***  8,000 more ballots: they'll all be for you.  trust me.

john jay @ 11.30.2018

p.s.  ***  btw, did it ever occur to you to ask, just where did these ballots come from?   who printed them?  who got them to the "voters?"    you figure it out.

in california, "democracy" means you vote, and then the dems count .... elections, bolshevik style ....

that little democrat joe stalin said it best, in "soviet democracy 101," when he observed that as between the voter and he who seeks power, it is the one who counts the votes who reigns supreme.

and so it goes in california, as more than "just a few" races for u.s. house seats, in which republicans who led when the votes were counted on election day, were later "resolved" in favor of democrats by "democratic" vote counters.

in california, "democracy" means you vote, and then the dems count the votes again, ... , bolshevik style.  little joe stalin, the little short democrat, is smiling in satisfaction, somewhere.  ask paul ryan, who of all people summoned up some gumption from somewhere, and commented on this.

in sum, california election officials are as dirty as any to be found in florida or nevada.  don't sell your guns, not just yet.

john jay @ 11.30.2018

the trouble w/ america ....

the trouble with america is that we are no longer a country with shared values, and a people,  but an empire comprised of disparate entities with no loyalty to the country, and no values to speak of except for contempt for honesty and integrity.  they are, in fact, loyal to nothing except gain.

the individual does not reign supreme, and, in fact, does not rule any longer.  we are governed by lotus eaters, vain, ignorant of history and science, and though it may sound a little strange to enunciate, insipid & superficial to the core: a herd rule by hysteria and vanity.***

simple as that.

john jay @ 11.26.2018  

***they believe that nothing is worth suffering or dying for, and, as a consequence, they also believe that nothing is worth living for, that life is nothing.  they get what they create, and they die in droves from suicide and drugs.  in this, they are at least consistent, for whatever that matters.  poor souls.  (they don't believe in that, either, sadly enough.)

mississippi .... what's it gonna be, maladroit or corrupt to the bone?

that's your choice, mississippi.   stupid, ... ,  or dishonest, venal and corrupt.

personally, i would go with merely stupid, and a little vacant looking.   espy is that, plus he is a dishonest and corrupt crook.**

some choice.  but, at least she will do as her leadership tells her.   and, that is repub.

john jay @ 11.26.2018

**and, a bit of a race baiter.  he'll follow the money, whoever pays the most.

mississippi senate run off ....

the republican wins.  that's my call.

republicans cast twice as many ballots, roughly speaking, as democrats in the initial vote.  i think democrats and the media tend to ignore this as they wax poetical over one stupid remark by the remaining republican.

the old adage, "she may be a stupid bitch, but she is our stupid bitch," will hold sway in this instance as it usually does.  if politicians suffered defeat for stupid remarks we would have precisely zero office holders.   zero, zilch, nada, nichts, none, ... , if you get the drift of it all.  all of this hullabaloo for one off-hand remark amounts to just dems and the media pissing into a pretty stiff breeze, in the light of reality.

dems/media grasping at straws.

john jay @ 11.20.2018 

 

update, 11.21.2018.  it looks as though the lady is doing her best to make me wrong in my prognosticating, insisting on making a race out of what should be a walk-away, if the media is to be trusted.   if the media is to be trusted.   they have lied at every turn trying to steal & influence votes & turnout votes,  here and there, (make that everywhere), and i have no doubt but that they are not to be trusted in their evaluation of anything having to do with this election cycle, or this specific election:  they have consistently lied about polling, and have consistently insisted dems were going to win in tight races, and it just hasn't happened in the senatorial races.  their forecasts in favor of democratic candidates just haven't materialized, for the most part.   so, can they be trusted about the mississippi senate run-off.  we'll see.  laughing.  end update.

 

brenda snipes in trouble .... she botched the recount ....

the fix was in.

exact brenda snipes botched the recount so badly, (getting caught red-handed counting illegal votes), that even the bastion of the leftist media, cnn, has declared the democrat for home the fix was operated dead in the water.

this is not the way a competent broward county thug is supposed to do things.   she will be axed.  not for attempting to run the fix, that has been in place for years, and the methodology well established.  no, he will get the axe to the back of the neck for botching it, and bringing to attention how it is run.

such is life.   big time demo one day, sleeping with your head on the curb the next day.  ain't this a great country.

john jay @ 11.17.2018

cali congress-person threatens to nuke citizens who assert constitutional rights .... yep, the second amendment discussion heats up ....

hey, the second amendment is right in the constitution, and it has been ruled by the supreme court of the u.s. that it is a personal and individual right pre-dating the constitution.  heller vs. washington, d.c..  you can look it up.

i haven't seen the whole thread/conversation, but the congress-fellow was apparently discussing the prospects of armed resistance to federal gun confiscation with another who was apparently advocating such resistance.  (get into a big boy argument, expect big boy responses, it must be conceded.  perhaps not-so-very-intelligent responses it must be observed, but you have expect the other fellow to swing back.  doncha.)

but, the fellow apparently advocating armed resistance to the gubment probably didn't expect what happened next.  the cali congress-entity got his umber up, and observed that any conflict between the gubment and private citizens, even if armed to the teeth, would be short-lived because the government has nukes.  and, at least this congress-idiot implied that he would be quite willing to use said nukes on any one who would resist the government, whether acting legally and in accord to the second amendment.  (john jay, first chief justice of the united states, alexander hamilton stalwart advocated of the federal bank, and james madison, future president of the united states argued in "the federalist papers" that such resistance to government tyranny was essential in preserving our rights and liberty.  never heard of 'em.  never read the federalist papers?  then you are part of the problem.)

now, the congress-person-with-the-long-dick which he had just stepped on quickly tried to back out of the plain import of what he'd just written, doing some serious backpedaling along the way, but, it does raise some interesting questions, doesn't it.  (including what they teach these numbskulls in the cali educational system.)

for instance.--

for instance, assume some serious resistance to a gubment offensive in beverly hills, home of movie stars, would the cali congress-person have the u.s. of a. drop a couple nukes on Beverly hills, or los angeles proper?   i think not, ... , why would he drop nukes on constituents.

but, say the gubment encountered some serious resistance to its efforts in milton freewater, oregon, not the home to movie stars and a serious concentration of snowflakes.  in short, not the congress-idiot's constituents, and not particularly well disposed to dumb asses such as himself.

would he have any hesitation in dropping a small nuke on milton freewater, just to serve as an object lesson to the more stubborn of the voting populace?  well, he said he would advocate that, didn't he?   and, if the twirp had the authority, no doubt he would do it.  after all, not many votes in the twirp's district up here in northeastern oregon.  (our governor, a good card carrying socialist, wouldn't mind very much, bless her little dwarfish heart.)

(well, mess with the mean doggie, and the mean doggie bites you on the ass, doesn't he?)

but, in milton freewater we have some snow flakes, and a couple democrats, and some others not as well endowed with smarts as the general run of the mill population.  it must be anticipated that congress-person-dumbass, he of the nuclear weapons aspirations, must anticipate incinerating a few innocents along with the gun nuts, he goes using nukes.

that prospect didn't seem to occur to him, nor cause him a second's hesitation in announcing his obviously dearly held fantasy.   and, yes, of course, being one of the cali congressional community, he backs nancy pelosi for speaker. 

do you have any doubt in your mind that this idiots pronouncements are simply asserting the most dearly held fantasies of pelosi and company.   we sub-humans in milton freewater, with our quaint notions that the english language, as set forth in the constitution, means exactly what it says, are simply the expendable deplorables so much beloved by democratic thinkers, the country over.

as joe stalin once observed, you cannot make an omelet without breaking a few eggs.  after all, dead is dead, and why get all worked up over a tactical nuke?

john jay @ 11.17.2018