in early november 2016, just days before the 2016 presidential election, stories broke out on the blogosphere linking bill and hillary clinton to a convicted sex offender by the name of jeffrey epstein and a pedophilia ring he was connected to in the caribbean. it was alleged that the clinton's had received airplane rides to locations in which this activity was ongoing. further articles hit the blogs linking the clinton's to a laura silsby, who, it was alleged, was involved in procuring underage haitian children for exploitation in these sex rings.
these articles included a twitter post by donald trump exploring these issues.
i wrote about it here,
and, here, this article discussing the trump allegations at some length,
immediately following on the publication of the story about the new york police department going public on these stories, fbi director james comey wrote his infamous letter to congress announcing that the fbi was reopening its email investigations of hillary clinton's abuse of her breach of security involving having state department secure & top secret emails on her home computers.
the story about the nypd releasing email evidence of the clinton's involvement in a vast criminal undertaking, said evidence found on anthony weiner's computer in his emails, quietly slipped away.
why? what happened to the nypd files? what happened to laura silsby? more fundamentally, where are the nypd files now, and did they in fact every exist? in short, did this story which just sort of quietly slipped under the waves without any bubbles have any substance?
i tend to believe that it had great substance, and i tend to believe that it revealed truth about the clinton's, and their proclivities. for one, actually two, very simple reasons.--
the clinton's just haven't said very much at all about the allegations that bill clinton flew 11 times to the caribbean on the "lolita express," epstein's private boeing aircraft. nor have they said very much about allegations that bill visited "orgy island" as epstein's guest on numerous occasions.
hillary clinton said absolutely nothing about don trump's reprint of the wikileaks articles linking her to laura silsby, who is widely suspected of illegally trafficking in underage haitian children, under the pretext of placing them in a foster home that never existed.
and, finally, the vaunted clinton legal teams never filed suit of any kind against the persons who published these allegations, said persons to include donald trump.
now, hillary has complained loudly and piteously about russian hacking of her personal computers (rather conveniently forgetting the salient fact that had she not had secure and top secret documents on her home computers the same never would have been hacked and leaked) costing her the election. it has become the mantra of the left.
but, she has said absolutely nothing of the fact that she stands as an accused pedophile, and enabler of an accused pedophile, and that she is an associate of people close to jeffrey epstein, to include allen dershowitz, the harvard lawyer. dershowitz himself doesn't look too damned good under close scrutiny about this, and has traveled on the "lolita express" to the caribbean on more than one occasion.
now, since i believe that the clinton's are in fact dirty on this, i am also inclined to believe that the clinton's will not institute legal actions against the people who have published these stories alleging defamation. one, truth is an absolute defense to legal defamation.
and, were the clinton's to file suit, then they would subject themselves to what is called pre-trial "discovery," said procedures to include depositions, requests for productions of documents, and requests for admission and denial. in short, any lawyer with extensive experience in discovery procedures would lay their activities in the caribbean, to include their association with laura silsby, absolutely bare to the bone.
one of the salient features of the request for admission, furthermore, is the award of attorney's fees and costs if a requested admission which is denied is subsequently proven true. you wanna fight over stuff like that, it is very expensive, and quite lucrative to the lawyer who can work the system.
why weren't the nypd files furnished to the public? who knows, but, several things suggest themselves in this oh so very cynical world.
do the files still exist? yes, they most certainly do, in my opinion. and, why do i say that? i say that because the physical existence of those files protects those who hold them, and/or have copies of them, from any retribution or course of action by the clinton's that may run counter to any deal that secured their suppression.
all of these things kind of make you appreciate why james comey was run through a wringer on the emails, and what may have been at stake.
the presidency for hillary clinton. bill clinton's "reputation." the reputation of allen dershowitz. the reputation of kevin spacey, who has also been on the "lolita express," destination the caribbean. and, a certain member of the english royalty, and potential heir to the throne of england.
lots of people may have contributed to the suppression of these nypd reports. and, there are likely good reasons that lots of people are not complaining about the stories that broke, for fear of opening very fresh wounds.
you think about it for just a bit. if donald trump had said these things about the clinton's and they were falsehoods, do you think the clinton's would have taken it lying down. well, it is the way in which they take most things, ... , but, if they had been truly wronged, and if they could have proved they had been truly wronged, they would not have remained silent.
their silence, in this case, speaks a several thousands of words.
john jay @ 01.18.2017
p.s. i have appended several thumbnails below on the fib/doj actions prior to the election on the clinton emails. i don't think much will come of it, because i believe comey's actions connected to the pedophilia ring and the pressure applied on him by the new york police deprtment: part of the "packaged deal," as it were. no one wants to get very deeply into that, seems to me.