at msn's "e" the story is headlined in the lead "thumbnail/snapshot" by the following headline, "there are clear pearl harbor day scenarios: the next wikileaks worry." follow the link, and the title of the story is a little more forthcoming, yet it simply does not touch on the issue of the scope of the cia's domestic surveillance of the "enemy's list" at the obama administration: this, during the entirety of the obama administration.
the dateline to the story is the usa today webpage, the article by elizabeth weise and jon swarz, published some two hours previous to 6.44 p.m. pacific on 03.08.2017. http://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/news/2017/03/08/wikileaks-cia-cyberwar-pearl-harbor-cyberweapons/98878016/
the next bombshell, according to usa today, will be the disclosure of the actual cia code to the rest of the world by wikileaks. (according to things i've already published previously, this has happened, and the code, un-copyrighted, has been openly available on the net since late 2016.)
this is neither here nor there, particularly in my opinion.
what is worthy of notice is: 1.)the cia bungled during the obama administration, late in the year 2016, and 2.)the code has been "loose" since that time, and 3.)official sources confirmed the loss late in 2016, but msn and usa today have not covered the story nor even hinted as to its existence until today, 03.08.2017.
and, they are hardly forthcoming about the actual import of the story, and the cia code.
to spell it out for you, .... , the cia has had this code for some time, and they have been exploiting it on a massive basis at the behest of the obama administration and the u.s justice department to spy on americans for some time now.
it would appear increasingly clear and indeed quite probable the donald trump was an object of that sort of spying on his phones in the trump tower, as were certain of his associates, and as was the trump campaign for president.
the msn/usa today story makes no mention of these allegations, very rapidly becoming established facts in my mind, and instead looks at some of the things the cia, and now anyone conversant with its code (which has to include hackers and all capable intelligence agencies in the world) has been able to do for years. the article speaks of the future, but, the fact is, the cia and the nsa have been able to spy on you using your own phone, and to track your location and movement using your own phone.
but, again, and this is the most important thing to be taken from this post, the main stream media at last has been forced to cover this story. now, i have gone to the msn website publishing this story, and quite pointedly suggested that donald trump's allegations that he was hacked by obama and loretta lynch acting through the cia/nsa has to be given credence and substance.
this is not the end of this.
the trump administration is seeking to gain access to the "fisa" court's list of warrants, to check on whether donald trump's phone was tapped by the obama administration, and on what legal basis, if any.
this story is just beginning. if i were obama and lynch, i would be looking for a home that does not have an extradition treaty with the united states of america. and, if hilary clinton thinks that her emails were tapped by the russians, it is way more likely at this juncture that they were tapped by barak obama and loretta lynch.
after all, as the msn/cia stories do not mention, the cia/nsa had russian malware code that it could "leave behind" to point at the russians, and deflect interest in our own domestic agencies as the source of the hacking of her email accounts.
russians? why would they interfere w/ clinton's election? they've owned american foreign policy for the past 8 years, and would have viewed the prospect of hilary's election with glee.
john jay @ 03.08.2017
i don't much care for john mccain, and i haven't since he and sarah palin ran against barak obama in the 2008 presidential campaign. i think that his timidity in the last two months of that campaign yanked defeat from the jaws of victory. subsequent events suggest to me that he went "in the tank" to satisfy the wishes of various establishment handlers .... this is pure & absolute speculation on my part, and i haven't a clue as to who any such person or persons might be. nor do i have any evidence to adduce to such supposition.
i also think that mccain is trying to scuttle donald trump's presidency, perhaps in service to that same "establishment." i have about as much evidence for this supposition as i do for my other thoughts about mccain.
i just wish, however, that mccain would dry up and blow away, and get out of politics and stop meddling in the due course of trump's presidency. i have stated that i wish that we could give him back to viet nam.
i have not changed my views with regard to that matter. i heartily maintain them. and, at the close of the above article i openly wondered how much mccain might have had to do with the circumstances that led to the fire aboard the u.s.s. forrestal on july 29, 1967 while operating at yankee station in the gulf of tonkin.
well, i have done some reading on the matter, and now i will do an update on my previous article concerning the old warn out hulk.
update, fire on the u.s.s. forrestal, 03.06.2017. despite a lot of chat room conversation it is abundantly clear that john mccain had nothing to do with the initial event that started the fire which ended up killing 134 sailors and aviators aboard the forrestal, and left another 161 injured, some very severely.
at the time of the fire and explosion on the forrestal deck mccain was in his plane, an a4-e skyhawk, waiting in "queue" for take off, his plane fully laden with bombs and other ordnance. he was flanked on either side of his plane by other a4-e medium bombers.
across the deck, in another take off queue were f4-b phantom fighters, many armed with "zuni" missiles. one of the phantoms, believed to be plane no. 110 from vf-11 launched a zuni missile, probably because an electrical surge, which went across the air craft carrier's deck, striking a fuel tank on the a4-e skyhawk sitting immediately adjacent to mccains aircraft: the missile did not explode as it passed through the fuel tank, its arming system preventing that. but, the fuel in the tank leaked onto the deck, and immediately caught fire.
the above account is taken from an article at wikipedia.
to this point, the narrative is pretty clear. and, it appears to me that it is virtually impossible to point to any error, or moral fault, on the part of john mccain which could have contributed to the launch of the zuni missile which clearly struck the plane next to his.
from here, however, the narrative gets a bit murky. and, the events on the forrestal very tragic.
when the missile struck the a4-e's fuel tank, the plane piloted by lieutenant commander fred d. white, no explosion occurred, but fuel from the ruptured tank flowed over the deck. it caught fire, and all of the reading i have done really points to no conclusive reason why.
what is clear is that shortly after the fire on the deck began, a 1,000 pound bomb from another a4-e fell to the deck, and rolled right into the middle of the jet fuel fire. the fire then ruptured other fuel tank's on white's plane, adding to the intensity of the fire. some 90 seconds after this occurred, the bomb exploded with tremendous force killing the members of a fire crew who were trying to extinguish the fuel fire, and opening a gaping hole in the deck of the forrestal, though which burning fuel drained into the decks below. lt. commander white was also killed in the explosion.
the force of the explosion was such that white's plane, and mccains a4-e were destroyed, blown up. lt. commander john mccain escaped death by clambering out of his plane, sliding down the nose, and jumping to the deck, and running to escape the burgeoning conflagration. he narrowly escaped the explosion which killed white and the fire crew. that much is abundantly clear.
what is also relatively clear is that mccain went below, and watched the unfolding events on a closed circuit t.v.: all told, the forrestal had 9 major bomb explosions on its decks, and to avoid more damage and fatalities pushed both aircraft and ordnance into the ocean to avoid more fire and explosion. mccain took no part in the efforts on deck to save his fellow pilots, the planes on the deck, and the ship itself which came perilously close to being sunk.
mccain's accounts of the events are confusing after he went below are, well, quite confusing.
mccain has claimed that the zuni missile struck his plane, and not white's, and that his plane dropped two bombs onto the deck, presumably to include the one that fueled the first explosion. most of the analysis that i have read appear to contradict this, and most accounts seem to indicate that only one bomb initially exploded in the jet fuel fire which killed white and the fire crews.
mccain can be forgiven this, as this certainly had to have been a confusing and harrowing set of circumstances. it is hardly surprising that in something like this accounts as to what happened would differ.
but, other things occurred after the fire and explosions that do not reflect well upon mccain's integrity or his honesty. he has reported that he was wounded by shrapnel, yet he did not report to sick bay for treatment. in fact, it is not clear that he sought medical treatment for any injury he has claimed. he left the ship the next day on a helicopter with a reporter, and flew to saigon where he apparently went drinking in a bar. he did not stay aboard the ship, and did not stay to attend the burials at sea of his ship mates and fellow pilots. he stayed away from duty for over a month, later describing the time as "r & r." it is not clear that he took authorized leave.
i would suggest that you read --
which is a four page excerpt from a longer book, detailing mccain's action after the forrestal fire and explosions. in sum, you will find that mccain's quick reaction & presence of mind to escape the havor caused by the missile's firing were admirable. but, i don't think that you will find his actions and accounts after he escaped the burning deck to have been proper, or admirable, or even particularly defenseable. he left a damaged ship, at a time when he could have served it, and he did not.
when he finally returned to the forrestal, he immediately requested transfer to another air craft carrier, which request was granted.
in sum, it doesn't appear that direct responsibility or fault can be ascribed to mccain for the fire and deaths on the forrestal, in any identifiable particular. and, certainly he took quick action to save his own life which cannot be faulted: his plane, after all was destroyed in the explosion which killed lt. commander white and destroyed white's plane. the deck of the forrestal was clearly a very dangerous place to be, and had mccain not immediately fled, he would have died, and accomplished little in that death. yet, he did not return to the deck where his presence might have been useful, and where he could have served his crew members. he stayed below.
in the weeks and months that followed, before he returned to active duty, there is little in his conduct which appears admirable. he was being, quite clearly, what can best be described as "self indulgent." and, much that does not jibe with the gloss he has placed on his conduct following the fire, and explosions, which took so many lives.
he did not display those character traits which would qualify him to serve as president of the united states, nor particularly the character desired in a united states senator. not in my estimation, at any rate.
end update, 03.06.2017 .
i don't like mccain, and perhaps my view of these events is skewed by that patent dislike. but, read the accounts, and see what you think. john mccain, in my estimation, started life as a spoiled brat, and it is likely that when he finally dies, he will die as a spoiled brat. a very old, scarred and very flawed, self indulgent spoiled brat. united states senator, indeed.
john jay @ 03.06.2017
the dam has burst, usa today and msn news cover the loss of code, update, 03.08.2017. the big boys are covering obama's screw up, though they haven't the cajones to call it that yet. but, they won't be able to avoid doing so, not for long.
even the brain dead will understand the significance of the cia blunders. and, event the brain dead will understand that the cia and the nsa have been surveilling every person in america, for years. (personally, i don't give a shit that they can surveill me. publish, and be damned. the cia/nsa and the gubment can simply go to hell, them, and the horse they road in on. end update.
the mainstream media awakes, update 03.08.2017. u.s. officials say wikileaks c.i.a. documents showing are genuine, and they were aware of the "security breach" in late 2016. this is the first acknowledgement in the mainstream media that the wikileaks documents are genuine. hmm, what does obama say about this, the lying bastard?
http://www.wctrib.com/news/4231213-us-officials-aware-cia-security-breach-2016-say-wikileaks-papers-authentic . the west central tribune, willmar, minnesota. from a reuters dispatch, reuters media today, 03.08.2017 at 12:16 pm eastern standard.
http://www.dnaindia.com/world/report-us-officials-aware-of-cia-security-breach-in-2016-say-wikileaks-papers-authentic-2347000 . dna, daily news and analysis, from a reuters dispath, reuters media today, 03.08.2017 at 11:48 am eastern standard.
well, the dam breaks. for those who only consider a proposition proved when the lamestream publishes it. end update.
update, hat tip "doug ross journal," 03.08.2017. white house to seek production of "fisa" warrants issued to investigate the trump campaign and trump associates. https://heatst.com/politics/president-trump-directs-white-house-counsel-to-find-fisa-warrants/ . while they are at it, they should get info on the applicant for the warrant, and all affidavits and legal briefing associated with the application. such information should include the names and identities, and positions within the government, of those seeking the warrant authorization. in short, everything. end update. source of link, "doug ross journal." directorblue.blogspot.com. a good place.
update on obama/cia/nsa illegal wiretaps at "captain's journal," 03.07.2017. herschel smith at the "captain's journal" has an excellent article on internal surveillance being conducted on americans by obama/cia/nsa such as has been alleged first by edward snowden, and now by donald trump. the title of his post is "wikileaks issues a beatdown to the c.i.a.," posted 8 minutes ago, 8.48 p.m. pacific time, the link to the article,
http://www.captainsjournal.com/2017/03/07/wikileaks-issues-a-beatdown-to-the-cia/ . this link was forwarded to me by "c," (hat tip) just minutes ago.
friends, if you think donald trump was talking through a cocked hat, i would remind you that he is president of the united states of american, that he has certain resources at his disposal, and that he didn't make himself a multi billionaire by being dull. end update.
update, to a discussion and list of articles on the "tools" of the "deep state," and how they conduct surveillance and lay the blame at the feet of the russians. sound "familiar"" 03.07.2017 . credit for this to herschel smith, at "the captains journal." this site has a whole list of articles which have broken recently on the cia's use of intel tools to conduct surveillance against american citizens. and, to lay the blame at the foot of the russians, by leaving russian created malware behind to cover their own tracks. (is anyone sufficiently awake to think that perhaps the cia and/or the nsa hacked stupid hilary's person email accounts, and left some mice droppings behind to frame the rooskies?)
the amazing thing is, according to the posts at the discussion site, is that the cia programs are of public domain, and anyone can use them.
go here, right now.
update on obama wiretaps, 03.07.2017. julian assange strikes again, and strikes again against obama and his criminal administration. wikileaks has released a list of those "tapped" by obama, who if not a kgb agent, has the instincts of a kgb agent.
it is evident that when obama wants to know, he stops at nothing to learn, and this includes abusing the power of the federal security wiretap. a friend wrote and told me i lacked "proof" of my assertions. well, here's proof. only you, and he, can decide whether it is a sufficiency of "proof." it is to me. period. end update.
my previous posts about obama & soros may have proven a bit "incendiary" to some of you. well, put this in your pipe and smoke it, if that is the case.--
obama, loretta lynch, bill and hillary clinton have conspired and continue to conspire to unseat a sitting president of the united states of america via the use of illegal wire taps of the presidential office, and of donald trumps private phone lines in the trump towers.
the obama administration sought "f.i.s.a.'s" (essentially search warrants for wire taps and suck like) against the trump campaign, and against trump even after the inauguration, and continuing until discovered. they continued to use such surveillance even after the subject matter & pretexts of the court authorizations had long "expired," and into the presidency of donald trump.
they widely disseminated the "information" obtained by such wiretaps to federal agencies not authorized to conduct the taps, arguably with the expectation that any information gathered would be "leaked."
by this conduct, they have sought to undermine the political and legal authority to govern of a sitting president of the united states, donald trump.
hat tips, for both articles, to "c."
loretta lynch sought the first "fisa" authorization for a wiretap, e.g., a search warrant made upon secret application, just after she met with bill clinton in her private jet, just after he sidled up to it in his private jet, on the tarmac in phoenix, arizona. (home turf to john mccain, btw. coincidence?)
the first "fisa" request was denied.
the second "fisa" request sought by the obama administration, a search warrant to be used by a candidate rapidly closing ground on hillary clinton, was sought thereafter, and it was granted. it was sought to establish a link between trump and a russian bank:
this was supposedly granted (james clapper denies it was granted) because there was a story swirling around that russian dossier and a computer server at trump tower being linked to a russian bank.
no evidence was found, the rumors unfounded, but the wiretaps continued. andrew mccarthy of the national review summed it up perfectly,
“the obama administration was monitoring an opposing presidential campaign using the high-tech surveillance powers of the federal intelligence services.”
the surveillance continued to be ongoing, even after donald trump was sworn in as president of the united states of america. this surveillance was sought by loretta lynch as attorney general serving under and at the behest of barak "insane" obama, and with the connivance of bill and hillary clinton.
this surveillance continued, and its results were disseminated to federal agencies, and then leaked to the washington post and the new york times well after inauguration day of this year, and false information from them was used by the news agencies and the papers named to attack donald trump, and to foment for investigations.
paragraphs 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 of the breitbart link above. read it, it makes very interesting reading. http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/03/03/mark-levin-obama-used-police-state-tactics-undermine-trump/
summation. while sitting as president of the united states, barak obama and loretta lynch sought on the thinnest of pretexts, not in law amounting to cause, to illegally wire tap the communications and phone calls of a candidate for president of the united states. this was done at the instance and with the full knowledge of bill and hillary clinton. even after donald trump was elected president of the united states of america these taps were left in place, monitoring what trump's most private communications had to offer.
this was allowed by obama and loretta lynch, and was allowed to continue to try and benefit hillary clinton's dwindling chances to become president. now do you understand the bullshit over the electoral college and other events, including ridiculous vote count challenges.
do i need to connect the dots.
this was a conspiracy at the highest levels to attempt to unseat a legally and validly elected president of the united states by a democratic president, a democratic attorney general, and a disgruntled loosing candidate and her former president husband. in this connivance we see the active accomplice involvement and connivance of a hyper leftist press.
this is sedition. these people are traitors to the united states.
they need to be prosecuted and jailed. if the legal niceties are to be followed. personally, were i donald trump, i would simply stuff them in a culvert under a lonely road in wyoming. that is their fitting end.
john jay @ 03.06.2017
p.s. now do you understand why we approach civil war? these are dangerous people who seek to subvert and control our democracy, by any means. period. if it takes civil war to prevent that from happening, it is worth every life sacrificed and every drop of blood shed. including mine.
if we are to have civil war, i propose the first battleground to be hard on the c.i.a. headquarters, which is the locus of obama's sedition campaign against the trump administration & the united states of america. just as in the bible, "... ashes to ashes ..." and all that, the objective of the first battle should be to level the c.i.a., plow the remains into the ground, and salt the earth above them.
as a second battleground, the state department should be next, and it should be room to room combat, starting with nicholas burns's office, and continuing until all of the clinton and obama appointees & hires are disposed of.
california, oregon and washington to be the next battlegrounds. (it will cut down on travel costs for me, personally. hell, start the whole fracas on my front porch, if it is to come to all that, and that will definitely save travel costs. i am old, and civil war will consume me quickly, so why not have a front porch view of the start. saves on gas & eats, and cuts down on anxiety, very quickly i should imagine. but, it will be fun while it lasts.)
the major city in the united states to be laid siege are new york city, and the headquarters of the lotus eaters in california. the rest will fall into line.
if obama & soros want civil war, let us give it to them, and the sooner the better. and, start with the hot beds of the opposition to the united states government as legally constituted, and destroy the c.i.a. and the state department, and take out the major media headquarters and outlets in the united states, to include the new york times and the washington post. and, don't forget the los angeles and seattle times newspapers, home to some of the most rabid leftists in the country.
let us not forget daily kos, my favorite. they promote obama's sedition, let them pay for it as well. fair is fair.
john jay @ 03.06.2017
p.s. i am a bit of a civil war history buff. to my mind, it is fitting that only 12 miles separate manassas junction, the site of the first battle of the american civil war from fairfax, virginia home of the c.i.a. why not keep epochal events in history in the same neighborhood, as it were?
before their continued & seditious actions lead to all out civil war.
it is as simple as that.
never in the history of this country has a former president of the united states actively tried to subvert the rule of his successor by such criminal antics as wire tapping and illegal surveillance, not to mention the promotion of active resistance to a president by the bureaucracy which is supposed to be supportive.
if soros and obama keep this up, it will lead us into a shooting war between the left and the right. i think it only prudent to prepare for such civil war.
john jay @ 03.06.2017
p.s. i see suggestions that trump my be preparing to prosecute obama for his actions. i truly hope so, and i hope that soros is prosecuted as well.
for what it is worth, i will go to the barricades w/ trump, and will defend him by armed combat if necessary. if the left wants to promote a fight, let us have it. the sooner the better.
isaac asimov's observation should be written on the small obscure head stone that marks the burial place of the mainstream media. it rose, it ruled, and now it slips into obsolescence and irrelevance. the new york times, the washington post, the glossy monthly journals are near death, their subscriptions melting away, their advertising revenues shrinking. where once the atlantic monthly was a place to read though provoking articles, ... , it isn't. mostly, the monthly publish puerile crap.
donald trump has chosen not to attend the big washington d.c. press corps dinner, deeming it not worth the bother. trump generates his own readership and exposure, and he has absolutely no need to use the press corps to reach his target audiences. and, more precisely, those people that pay attention to what the "press corps" writes about, and what they think about things, are not trump's concern or worry: he does not tailor his public statements in an effort to woo those who care about what the press thinks.
the press is irrelevant in donald trump's universe. if and when they become important to him, he will seek a rapprochement. until then, he cares not a whit for them, and will not be a source of fodder to stroke their egos.
hat tip "c" for the following link, and article.--
taki's magazine has published an article by david cole entitled "the media and relevance: a slow fade out." 03.02.2017 . http://takimag.com/article/the_media_and_relevance_a_slow_fade_out_david_cole/print#axzz4a8qLF5B9 .
the thesis advanced in the article is pretty straightforward, and of fundamental concern to the media: it is that the power of the media fades as it becomes increasingly marginalized by its leftist posture, and obsolescent in its technology, being replaced quite rapidly by media outlets that allow people like donald trump to reach far greater numbers than he can through traditional media, and to tailor and form his message precisely as he wishes to present it. in short, donald trump reaches who he wants to reach, and without the bother of having his message diluted and filtered through a hostile media.
this is the thing. most who like and admire trump and voted for him, (include me in), don't care for the mainstream media, and view it antagonistically because it distorts fact and events to conform to its leftist view of the world. in short, the media types are mostly a bunch of leftist assholes who lie to promote their own agenda.
pamela geller and others call it the "enemedia," (a cross between enema and enemy and media, which i find entirely appropriate), and i agree. in my view, the mainstream media is nothing more or less than the propaganda arm of the left, the progressives, the communists and the irretrievably whacky and perverse.
think about the fact that the washington post has hired pedarist-pedophile john podesta to write a column. i want nothing to do with that intellectual corruption and decadence, predicated as it is upon immoral perversion. shame on the post. you think that i am gonna pay to read that trash, you got another think coming.
this is one reason why increasing numbers do not read the media, and view it as the enemy. the media has chosen perversion as its morality, and makes no apology for its "life style" choices.
it is precisely why the media has no reach, no influence, no amount of attitude formulation over the great bulk and majority of the american people. the american people, as all people, are traditionalists, and oriented to family, and values of honesty, integrity and uprightness. they believe in good. they are not "cultural relativists." they do not believe in the sacrifice of good on the alter of expediency. in short, they simply do not believe in those notions that fuel progressives, and that have been adopted by the media, and propounded by the various factions and minority groups that seem to hold sway over the leftist "intelligentsia."
and, they are not buying what the media sells.
and, donald trump does not look to the media to inform his values and value formation, and has absolutely no need of the media to determine and inform his world view. and, neither do i, and most people (it is my belief.)
so, donald trump spurns the media, and so do i. and, the other reason is that i have alternative sources of truth that i trust, featuring essays that are written by scholars and feature in depth treatment of their subjects, along with a blogosphere that digs for the truth no matter where it leads.
but, go to david coles analysis, which is thoughtful, provocative and entertaining, and explains why the mainstream media is swirling in the toilet bowl flush of oblivion. it is right that we regard the media as the "enemedia." i wish that i had coined the phrase.
john jay @ 03.02.2017
soldiers fight, and some soldiers die or are wounded, and this soldiers accept and expect.
what they do not accept and expect is contempt and derision from those they fight to defend, and from a group or society that looks down upon them. (you may read "tommy" by rudyard kipling at this point, if you wish.) and, as a general rule, you will not find soldiers who fight and defend those who look down upon them with contempt, and who will not extend to them the respect and admiration their due. this is simply biologically and historically ingrained in the fighting man.
the american soldier at this point in our history does not regard the american progressive leftist, e.g., democrats, socialists and communists with anything other than a reciprocal contempt, and an additional repulsion that is inborn in the fighting man, the fighting man's contempt for the physical and moral coward.
with their performance at the president's state of the union speech, in which democrats treated the widow of one of their own fallen with contempt and disrespect, the american military will not lift a finger to aid democrats in any sort of conflict with donald trump, and they are quite likely to support trump at the ballot box, and with their presence in the field of conflict should trump need them.
before the state of the union some of the idiotic leftist mewing for "coup" were only ridiculous: the american military has never overtly interfered in american politics. after their ludicrous and vile behavior in the congress of the united states at the state of the union address, when they would not stand in respect for the widow of an american who fell in combat, it is utterly and absolutely impossible that they will ever rise in support of the left against trump.
trump will not be run out of town. he will master the bureaucracy, and bring it under reign. and, there will be no political uprising against him: he will simply go to the people for support and help against the left, and he will get it. and, he will not have to harbor any concern about intervention of the military in a coup in support of the left: anything remotely resembling that will be immediately crushed by the soldier.
the soldier knows for what he fights, and for whom, and he knows why he fights and sacrifices. and, he knows full well, it is not for some piss ant liberal pantywaist who does not stand for military widows, with head to his chest and hand to his heart, with respect written on his mien.
the sad part about this, in my mind, is that the left has not fallen as low as it can get. they have plenty of "bottom" left.
john jay @ 03.01.2017
quite frankly, i don't know what else to say about the ignorant bastards. it appears as though we are witnessing the disintegration and disappearance of the democratic party. they behaved this way at the state of the union address by the president of the united states, the petulant little snots.
they didn't elect a muslim radical supporter of jihad to head their party, but, he stood with the new chairman in a show of "solidarity." he, displaying the idiocy now common to all democrats, did not stand for the wife of a slain soldier.
what a pathetic display on their parts.
and, i suspect one that will not be forgotten by most americans for some time. a totally classless "act," which smacks of disdain and contempt for the sacrifice of those who serve their country, and for the families of servicemen.
john jay @ 03.01.2017
p.s. typepad has little thingies that appear at the bottom of the word processor, which are supposed to supply "suggestions" for related articles. not one is related to the dems not standing for the soldier's wife. now, why do you suppose that is?
john podesta, late of the clinton campaign for president, has been hired by the washington post. i am presuming, since he will be writing on what he knows best and is closest to, that he will be writing on satanic and occult dining practices, and on caribbean pedophilia practices.
it is my further understanding that beyonce and lady gaga may be appearing as guest writers for his perusings.
i am further assuming that he will follow the writer's most sacred instruction, in that he will write about what he knows about. it will be interesting to see what he has to say about his jaunts on "the lolita express" with bill clinton, and other demo worthies. the family that plays together, stays together.
and now, we are given to understand just how far his family extends.
john jay @ 03.01.2017