at msn's "e" the story is headlined in the lead "thumbnail/snapshot" by the following headline, "there are clear pearl harbor day scenarios: the next wikileaks worry." follow the link, and the title of the story is a little more forthcoming, yet it simply does not touch on the issue of the scope of the cia's domestic surveillance of the "enemy's list" at the obama administration: this, during the entirety of the obama administration.
the dateline to the story is the usa today webpage, the article by elizabeth weise and jon swarz, published some two hours previous to 6.44 p.m. pacific on 03.08.2017. http://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/news/2017/03/08/wikileaks-cia-cyberwar-pearl-harbor-cyberweapons/98878016/
the next bombshell, according to usa today, will be the disclosure of the actual cia code to the rest of the world by wikileaks. (according to things i've already published previously, this has happened, and the code, un-copyrighted, has been openly available on the net since late 2016.)
this is neither here nor there, particularly in my opinion.
what is worthy of notice is: 1.)the cia bungled during the obama administration, late in the year 2016, and 2.)the code has been "loose" since that time, and 3.)official sources confirmed the loss late in 2016, but msn and usa today have not covered the story nor even hinted as to its existence until today, 03.08.2017.
and, they are hardly forthcoming about the actual import of the story, and the cia code.
to spell it out for you, .... , the cia has had this code for some time, and they have been exploiting it on a massive basis at the behest of the obama administration and the u.s justice department to spy on americans for some time now.
it would appear increasingly clear and indeed quite probable the donald trump was an object of that sort of spying on his phones in the trump tower, as were certain of his associates, and as was the trump campaign for president.
the msn/usa today story makes no mention of these allegations, very rapidly becoming established facts in my mind, and instead looks at some of the things the cia, and now anyone conversant with its code (which has to include hackers and all capable intelligence agencies in the world) has been able to do for years. the article speaks of the future, but, the fact is, the cia and the nsa have been able to spy on you using your own phone, and to track your location and movement using your own phone.
but, again, and this is the most important thing to be taken from this post, the main stream media at last has been forced to cover this story. now, i have gone to the msn website publishing this story, and quite pointedly suggested that donald trump's allegations that he was hacked by obama and loretta lynch acting through the cia/nsa has to be given credence and substance.
this is not the end of this.
the trump administration is seeking to gain access to the "fisa" court's list of warrants, to check on whether donald trump's phone was tapped by the obama administration, and on what legal basis, if any.
this story is just beginning. if i were obama and lynch, i would be looking for a home that does not have an extradition treaty with the united states of america. and, if hilary clinton thinks that her emails were tapped by the russians, it is way more likely at this juncture that they were tapped by barak obama and loretta lynch.
after all, as the msn/cia stories do not mention, the cia/nsa had russian malware code that it could "leave behind" to point at the russians, and deflect interest in our own domestic agencies as the source of the hacking of her email accounts.
russians? why would they interfere w/ clinton's election? they've owned american foreign policy for the past 8 years, and would have viewed the prospect of hilary's election with glee.
john jay @ 03.08.2017