it is really pretty simple.
if hillary's private emails & server would exonerate her from all violation of the law, and further & lower skulduggery, (such as treason, for instance), she would publish them.
they will not, rather they will provide overwhelming complicity in all kinds of things. that's why she attempted to hide them.
caption: tip of the old hat to carolyn e. no, i don't know when "ce" sleeps, she is on this kinda stuff instantly. she just pounces.
that's why she will not "publish." she cannot publish, as she would place the noose around her own neck.
she will not utter, "publish, and be damned." field marshall the 1st duke of wellington, sir arthur wellesley. http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/rear-window-when-wellington-said-publish-and-be-damned-the-field-marshal-and-the-scarlet-woman-1430412.html .
if she is to be hung, and she will be, it will be at the hand of others, and not her own.
john jay @ 03.11.2015
p.s. the libtards are abandoning ship on old, tired, fat & homely hillary.
his legal and political opinion? hillary's "private server" was illegal, illegal and a little more illegal, under the freedom of information act and under the official documents act. period. end of discussion.
end of hillary? let us hope.