usually a couple days pondering on something, and i've at least got it figured out what i think about it. what "i think about it" may not comport with historical truth, and may not be very enlightened or in line with the "current thinking" on something, but, it is what i think. at least i know what that is.
rachel jeantel, quite frankly, has got me stumped. (she was the girl friend of the recently departed trayvon martin, and testified in the trial of a mr. zimmerman, who was acquitted of any criminal wrong in the death/departure of mr. martin. for those of you who've been sleeping under a rock as of late.)
she has achieved some notoriety as a result of her testimony, and is something of "a rage" on the talk shows.
it's a mystery to me.--
after considering the matter, i've arrived at a "no decision" regarding who is more stupid, rachel jeantel, or those who give a rip as to what the the squat, homely, illiterate & ignorant, loud mouthed arrogant miscreant twit has to say about anything, or those who put such tripe on the airways?
it remains a "horse race" in my mind.
john jay @ 07.18.2013
p.s. i am given to understand that she has been offered "full ride" "scholarships" to a number of black colleges. well, we'll see if you can make a silk purse from a sow's ear. i personally doubt that it will work out that way.