barack obama must have a major hard on for hillary clinton, as the servile lickspittles in the mainstream media who do his bidding are beginning to turn their animus upon hillary clinton for her role in benghazi. that would be, both pre- and post- cover-up. (i use the phrase not to describe those at wnd, most assuredly not, but it does for suresies encompass the asses at the new york times and the washington post, and the broadcast mavens.)
at wnd this day, the article, "hillary clinton snagged in benghazi cover-up," http://www.wnd.com/2013/03/hillary-clinton-snagged-in-benghazi-cover-up/ , the article written by aaron klein, byline jerusalem. this article pretty thoroughly covers hillary's role in planning the gun running scheme, and also covers her involvement in trying to hide this aspect of the whole sordid story.
those of us who have been writing about this from the get go understand that hillary clinton is a lying bitch, and that she and obama let ambassador stevens burn so that the gun running scheme being run and directed out of benghazi to the syrian rebels would not be uncovered.
look it up, if you will.
suffice it to say, the the whole narrative out of the white house has been, from zero hour, a pack of lies. they lied about the attack, they lied about who carried on the attack, they lied about the timing of events, and they tried to pin the blame for the attack upon some poor witless film maker, theretofore unknown, and obscure since. u.s. embassies issued lies about the attack until they were revealed and properly ridiculed.
the washington times exposed the gun running aspect of things months ago, even publishing pictures of the ship that carried arms, including missiles, to turkey and thence to syria, as it arrived in port in turkey.
now, 7 months later, the new york times is "hot on the trail."
they will expose no new truths. that's just not in the offing, because for one thing, they won't get off their fat butts to investigate anything not spoon fed to them. and, what they do reveal, will have been common knowledge among conservative bloggers for months.
so, why do i even write about it? why bother?
well, it is interesting, because it says that someone in the highest circles of the american/european left has decided to take hillary clinton out, and to destroy her presidential aspirations, if she had any remaining. and, that they've decided to do "reveal" these things, means she did. (in their estimation.) (and, not anymore, she won't.)
by the time they are done with her, she couldn't get elected dog catcher in yonkers.
john jay @ 04.01.2013