in the previous post, i made a remark about where the people come from who serve in the united states military. i forwarded the proposition that military personnel come from small towns and rural communities, ... , and there is a "lot" of that in n.e. oregon.
by inference, you may conclude safely that it is my position that not many of them come from the cities that support the pretender obama.
you don't believe me?
i suggest that you do a simple exercise. simply google the department of defense pages that list the deaths and casualties in the u.s. military from your state, year by year. if you do that, as i have more than once, you will find (unless things have suddenly changed, unremarked by me) that the person who die and are injured serving their country are by and large from the small towns of america and the rural areas of america, ... , you will not find a proportionate number from the cities and urban areas of this country.
city kids, urban kids, college graduates do not serve their country in combat, nor in the military. they may very well do so in other ways, but, these ways are not by and large accompanied by the risk of violent death or injury.
should the matters before us devolve into violent conflict, i do not see the urban and city kids being any more inclined to defend obama than they are to defend their country.
by contrast, i think my kind of kid will stand for his rights, and will stand for his kith and kin.
that's what i mean by all of that.
john jay @ 11.22.2012
p.s. so who's side do you think this puts 99% of the vets who served? how much do you think they like obama? they took the incoming, and they carried the rifles for uncle sam, so how much do you think they like/will like being told they cannot be trusted to carry arms?
you think they haven't noticed the dickless wonder hasn't mentioned the ft. hood islam jihadist shooter, who murdered their brothers in arms? and, that he's not been tried, and that he still receives salaries and promotions?