http://ajacksonian.blogspot.com/ . i suggest you go there and browse, and read.
i wrote a post on "cross border authority," to which ajacksonian offered a response as clear and logical on what the benghazi attack has cost this nation that i feel impelled to print it as a post at this blog.
i will offer a few remarks at the bottom of this post, but ajacksonian's analysis is so logical, so imbued with reason, and so forceful that i need say very little about it. i have seen no better summation, nor have i written anything to equal it.
here is what he wrote. ~~
.........................................................................................................................
Posted by: Ajacksonian.blogspot.com | November 03, 2012 at 05:24 PM
....................................................................................................................
i would add these observations, which are openly implied in ajacksonians letter.
as a country, we have lost honor, and we have lost the standing that honor gives a nation in the world. the feeble response by obama and his team makes a mockery of the strength of this country, and is a sickening commentary of the lack of values in the administration which occupies our house.
we have lost the protection of any deterrent to such attack. is there a nation or terrorist organization in the world not emboldened to attack a united states consulate anywhere, given the dilatory handling of the benghazi attack, give the puerile rhetoric and lies characterizing the administrations response to criticism, and given the complete lack of any meaningful and rational retaliation.
in that line, we have endangered the conduct of international diplomacy. all diplomatic missions are endangered by our absence of any meaningful response to the attack.
president obama has humiliated our military and crippled our intelligence gathering in the middle east. what idiot would become an intelligence asset for the united states, when we do not even protect our own.
we have been emasculated. not to hard to conceptualize, when our current administration is run by a "man" like barack obama, and an entity like hillary clinton. the apology of the cairo embassy, to crawl before those who attack us, was craven and a singular act of abasement.
this attack was no different than an attack upon a federal court house, or the twin towers, and demanded a similar response & appropriate response. that such was not forthcoming is one of the singular failures and humiliations ever in the history of this great country.
finally, obama has destroyed any notion that a host country is to be held responsible for the safety and security of the diplomatic mission, those little outposts of foreign soil, which are located within its borders. first, the pack of amateurs at the state department contracted with al queda to secure the mission. second, a libyan "police officer" was caught photographing the interior of the consulate hours before the attack. third, the "security guards" melted away and fled, or more likely joined the attackers, once the attack began. and, fourth, libyan government troops showed up at the mission, just moments after our two brave navy seals were killed. (to collect their mortars, in my estimation, ... , who the hell else has heavy mortars? something not really addressed anywhere.)
there is one remedy. we must rid ourselves of this idiot, this friend of the jihad, by any means necessary.
john jay @ 11.04.2012
p.s. and, do you know, that this dickless wonder has called in united nations "elections supervisors" to make sure that the tea party carries on no terrorist activities to inhibit proper behavior and voting at our polls. has our god forsaken us?
get out, do you jobs, and evict this abomination, this obamanation, from our house.
There are so many issues that it is hard to know where to start...
First - An Ambassador is a representative not just of the Nation but also the person appointed by the President, thus a personal representative of the Head of State, as well. An attack on an Ambassador is an affair of State, and an assassination an act of war.
Second - US Soil via the extra-territorial enclave was attacked, which is also an act of war.
Third - INTEL was left unguarded, laying around for anyone, including the enemy, to find. If you can't rescue the Ambassador, then the sites must be sanitized. A specialized military team would be tasked for that and 'to make sure' there would be additional steps taken for anything that was buried (a number of methods are available for that). If a military team could not get there then there is sanitizing from the air. When an act of war has happened and involves valuable information to the US, the first job of the President is to ensure that nothing critical falls into the hands of the enemy. Not to do so is a dereliction of duty. With two acts of war having taken place, why wasn't (and why hasn't) the sites in question been sanitized? Especially if one of them was a CIA site.
Fourth - Where was the concern by the President for his personal representative to Libya? Ambassador Stephens is appointed with consent of the Senate, so it requires a bit of input by the President to get that done. And just what were Stephens' qualifications, anyways? Who was this man? What awards did he get? What was his background? And just why was he meeting up with the Turks in Libya? Where is the personal outrage by the President? Or at least feigned outrage?
Fifth - Leaving aside Stephens' implied CIA work (which goes with the territory) one of the stated goals of the US was to secure the MANPADs and WMD material in Libya. Some of the WMD materials were secured, but 3/4 of the MANPADs went walkabout. They are critical as any ground force without air cover needs a way to counter enemy air, and was the reason that NATO via the UN assisted the Libyan 'rebels'. Soviet SA MANPADs have since shown up in Syria in the hands of the 'rebels' there, via Turkey. Why is the US helping to shuttle MANPADs around the Middle East? Are we unconcerned with the presence of AQIM in Libya and Syria? AQIM has demonstrated capability to get arms from the Libyan debacle and move them to Mali, Mauritania, Niger, Burkina Faso and other places, so is that not a concern to the US that our activities are resulting in the spread of arms to al Qaeda?
All of this before you can even get to the cover-up... and it appears there is a lot to distract the American people from and cover up.
Neglect of duty at this level is not by accident, considering how al Qaeda is already fighting us wherever they can. Even if it is completely and utterly unintentional, the shift of arms to al Qaeda and the non-response to their provocative acts of war against the US is horrifying.
al Qaeda has been consciously carrying out The Management of Savagery doctrine and it just taken at face value of what is going on with the so-called 'Arab Spring', Libya and now Syria, it is a successful utilization of a primitive doctrine aided and abetted by US negligence (at best) and complicity (at worse).
This stinks, and the assassination of our Ambassador isn't even the worst of it.