this interesting post at barking-moonbat on debate no. 2 ...

drew has this analysis at barking-moonbat on debate no. 2 twixt obama and romney.  a pretty good view of things, i think.

http://www.barking-moonbat.com/index.php/weblog/and_again_they_face_off/ .

you go there and read it, for an interesting perspective on the debates.  it is a good and worthwhile read, from a steady-as-she-goes writer.  always a good place to drop in and read a spell.

john jay @ 10.19.2012

Comments

[WestwardHo]

Some other worthy observations on the debate here:
http://hillbuzz.org/ten-important-things-you-might-have-missed-in-the-second-presidential-debate-hofstras-romney-vs-obama-debate-on-10162012

The writer brings experience to bear that I do not have, but I'm inclined to seriously consider his reactions, especially item #9, about Obama's cocaine "tells" during the debate.

I enjoy your blog, JJ.

[john jay]

westward:

thank you for the read and the comment.

i like hill buzz. it is quite lively, and the editor kevin dujan has an interesting perspective on things.

i will take a look at the link, as i have not read it yet.

john jay