tip o' the hat, to chipps w.
i have just read an interesting post at pajamas media by roger simon, majordomo of the whole operation, entitled "benghazi worse than watergate," posted sept. 29, 2012. http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2012/09/29/benghazi-worse-than-watergate/ .
quite frankly, i am not interested in whether the administration cover up of what happened in benghazi is worse than the watergate burglary, ... , to me, it is enough that obama & clinton & susan rice are liars, and it is enough to understand that the media are complicit in the lies, and will do nothing to examine them.
what i am interested in, however, is shown by these following few brief passages from simon's article, in which he notes plaintively that he does not understand what is going on. he writes:
you could say that is appeasement. unfortunately, I am beginning to think it is more than that. it is, on the part of some, intentional.
we can trace that back, among other places, to obama’s famous cairo speech. that speech was naïve, yes, but even more it was subversive in its intentions. http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2012/09/29/benghazi-worse-than-watergate/
if roger simon is "beginning" to think that the obama administrations policy of appeasement towards islam is "intentional," if he is just coming to that realization, then he simply hasn't been paying attention. and, if he thinks that obama's speech at cairo was "naive," then he is just a little late for the bus.
obama's speech to islam assembled at cairo was anything except naivete: it was in fact, the announced policy of the radical left in this country, as long sponsored by george soros. this policy was published in a remarkable pamphlet in december of 2008 entitled "changing course: a new direction for u.s. relations with the muslim world." the pdf is here, http://www.usmuslimengagement.org/storage/usme/documents/C .
this document was put together by a "think tank" assembled by george soros and headed by madeline albright. it brought together leftists from within the state department of the united states, and avowed islamists and muslims, and together they composed a road map by which a u.s. administration could seek to integrate the west and the islamic world.
simply and directly put, this document outlines a suggested course of acts & time line by which a new president of the united states (anticipating the election of obama, i would suppose) could act to engage the muslim world, and to integrate the views of islam into american culture, educational institutions and the u.s. news media. it is very big on this integration of islamic and american life, and suggests all sorts of schemes by which it might occur, including the integration of the editorial and production staffs of muslim and american newsroom and broadcast studios.
you doubt me? get off the television for a bit, and read the document, in its entirety, as i have done several times.
it suggested a "cairo" speech, and it suggested the policy of appeasement adopted by obama. it suggested any number of other paths, since followed by obama.
everything that roger simon puzzles over as being "perhaps" intentional and not so haphazard as heretofore imagined, was in fact set out in this document. obama has followed it prescribed course to the "t," and has not departed from it.
i have written extensively on this topic. i have been ignored widely, and my writing has caused nary a ripple on the obama pond. but, i am going to republish the links, in hopes that some of you will read the pdf linked above, and will take a look at my seminal analysis of the radical lefts policy towards islam, as implemented and followed by barack obama.
1.) http://wintersoldier2008.typepad.com/summer_patriot_winter_sol/2009/03/obamas-vision-a-muslim-compatible-america-.html -- an in depth analysis of the pamphlet, "changing course: ... ." if you will but read it, you will see obama's course as unerring, intentional, and definitely not the result of naivete. read the march 22, 2009 article, as it is punctuated & capped, for your convenience.
my dear friends. none of what the left and obama have done with regard to the muslim world, and as pertains to the abandonment of israel, is shrouded in any sort of mystery or doubt. it has been the result of an announced and calculated plan to curry favor with islam, and to incorporate it into our world.
and you can read it.
what the radical left has done,is doing, has tremendous implications for world wide christianity, and for jews and the jewish state. put simply, the democrats, the left, obama, ... , have chose islam over christianity and judaism.
and, that's not the least of it.
if you want to know, read. now, at the end of my post, i have also lined to articles at atlas shrugs, proprietor, pamela geller, and some of her work on this topic. it is good, but, it is not nearly as thorough as my work, and my analysis of the documents and their impact on american foreign policy.
and, you'll find nothing i am aware of anywhere else that is, either.
john jay @ 09.30.2012
update, 09.30.2012. our views contrast, as abe miller thinks obama is "failed." i think him amazingly successful, however, at following the dictates of the muslim brotherhood and the o.i.c., and the schemes set forth in "changing course: ... ."
but, (and be that as it may), abe miller has written a related post at american thinker with regard to the absolute & abysmal failure of the "state craft" of the obama administration in the middle east.
abe is absolutely correct if you view "failure" within the context of the normal aims of american foreign policy, as followed almost uniformly by republican and democratic administrations for the 60 or 70 years preceding what i like to call the "disaster," e.g., the election of bark "no bite" obama. on the other hand, (and as noted above) obama's foreign policy is an absolute raging success if viewed from within the context of his goals as a devout muslim and radical leftist/marxist. some, like roger simon, and to a limited extent abe miller, merely view obama as failed. by contrast, i view obama as purposefully malignant, and a wrecker and despoiler. be that as it may, and given the minor difference in focus in the articles, abe millers post at "american thinker" is brilliant. it is very well written, thoroughly vetted, and makes his case. go there, and read it. end update.