just who in the hell decided that the effete little leftist, that little man boy, the nattering nabob of the school of soft knocks, the one, the only, george stephanopoulos should be the one to define the republican agenda during this run up to 2012.
and, just who among the "genius" republican strategists decided to allow this to go on?
it is bad enough that in their unfettered ambition the republican hopefuls should be bashing each other, instead of formulating a concerted and unanimous attack upon the idiot obama, but to allow the little prick stephanopoulos to grill their fellows (and even to pick up on some of his criticisms by which to "bash" their rivals), and not rise to a defense of his implicit socialism that lies behind such grilling, is not something that i like watching.
now, i do not much care for the spittle flecked muzzle of someone like james carrville braying his attack like the mad jackass that he is, but, at least he has the "virtue" of being precisely and identifiably what he is, an attack dog. not so the obsequious little stephanopoulos, the annoying little buzzing gnat, the fawning pit viper, who hides behind every artifice and pleasantry at his command to hide the daggers poised over the carotids of his victims.
i despise the little man. and, every time he attacks a basic republican tenet clothed as a "question," every time he argues a liberal agenda as a "question's" preface, he should be attacked and exposed like a wounded fawn before the ravenous attack of the republican candidates.
if they cannot muster this kind of good sense, that dose of hot mustard, they will not get my vote. and, guess what, they shall not get anyone else's vote, either. for, george stephanopoulos shall have taken care of that.
john jay @ 01.08.2012
Comments