"dear jerry sandusky:
i have it on the as of yet unsubstantiated & uncorroborated assertions of one of my graduate assistants that you are a flaming pederast and queer, and that you molest children.
despite your contractual relations with penn state university, and your tenure, and the other rights and privileges that you have acquired in your coaching career, you are hereby dismissed as defensive coordinator from the football team, and you had better keep your ass off campus while i am still around.
in short, your ass is fired, summarily at my pleasure.
sincerely yours,
joseph paterno"
now, how would you tolerant hyper pious shits have reacted then? well, i will tell you how. you would have excoriated, pilloried and eviscerated joe paterno for being the knuckle dragging intolerant reactionary crazy enough to try and impinge upon the rights of a gay person.
in your zeal of "tolerance" you would have branded him bigot.
just as in your zeal of holier than thou piety you castigate paterno for his "sins of omission[s]."
you have absolutely no insight into the fact that prior to the issuance of the grand jury's presentment/indictment, the officials at pennsylvania state university had their hands tied by the tender cords of affirmative action and tolerance, and the promotion of the gay life style by the cognoscenti, literati and intelligentsia of american society.
punish a man for an alternative lifestyle? not politically correct, and so non de rigueur.
having created the situation that prevented anyone from doing anything about sandusky's predilections, you now show an almost incomprehensible zeal for pillorying paterno for something he could not nothing about, had he even known about sandusky.
and, i will remind you fucking dullards, though i have done so repeatedly in my complete obscurity to absolutely no effect, paterno did everything he could about the situation by reporting the matter to his administrative superiors, and by encouraging then graduate asst. coach mcquery to report the matter as well.
i can assure you, the grand jury who reviewed the facts of the matter took that view. again, you damned dolts, read "victim no. 2, ... " pages 6-13 of the grand jury presentment, if you are too god damned thick to take my word for it.
you are pious, intellectually dishonest shits, and i hope you suffer at god's hands for it. you destroy a good man because you are ignorant short sighted shit heads, to put the matter bluntly.
john jay @ 11.11.2011
p.s. yes, this means you, schlabach & maisel, you arrogant pups. john 8:7, you should read it.
Comments