well, which is it?
conscious purposeful betrayal?
willful stupidity, a delusional & arrogant belief in their diplomatic "skills?"
in an earlier post, http://wintersoldier2008.typepad.com/summer_patriot_winter_sol/2010/01/the-radical-left-so-despises-europe-that-it-intends-to-destroy-it-by-muslim-immigration-and-i-have-t.html , i argued that euro leftist technocrats were bent on the destruction of the european nation states in order to elevate the euro union into uncontested supremacy as a unitary state system on the european continent, and that they meant to use muslim immigration as the device to work that destruction.
that article clearly stood for the proposition that the faceless dickless mollusk technocrats meant to betray their european heritage upon the alter of collectivist socialism. the above post was linked at european blogs, http://missioneuropakmartell.wordpress.com/2010/01/14/the-radical-left-so-despises-europe-that-it-intends-to-destroy-it-by-muslim-immigration-and-i-have-the-source-documents-from-the-euro-union-and-the-euro-med-association-agreements-to-prove-it/ , and, http://euro-med.dk/ .
in the post immediately proceeding this post, http://wintersoldier2008.typepad.com/summer_patriot_winter_sol/2011/06/the-muslim-brotherhood-and-the-death-of-the-european-union-.html , i have taken the more moderate stance that islam's head long rush back to the dark ages in the middle east exposed a colossal miscalculation on the part of the faceless dickless mollusks, in that their bureaucratic approach of using diplomacy, … , e.g., the europ med association agreements signed between the euro med/union and the arab/muslim governments of the mediterranean basin, … , as a buffer between the european states and the relentless demographic invasion of islam has proved quite misguided.
i suppose that article stood for the proposition that the leftist technocrats who really run the euro union were frightfully and monumentally in error when they thought that they could further graft the european model of statist stability onto the political and social turmoil that is traditional islam.
in short i have allowed for the possibility that in a fit of willful stupidity, the mollusks had simply chosen the wrong olive branch to graft onto the european root stock and heritage. and, that they betray europe not willfully, but by diplomatic ineptitude.
well, there is a tension there, isn’t there, between the underlying assumptions of the two posts? perhaps an irreconcilable tension.
in my intellectual defense, if i need to mount one and i am not sure that i do, it is simply to remark that it is hard to know the beliefs and motivations of persons who never reveal what their motivations are, who never assert them let alone defend them through the process of open societal debate, and who are accountable to no one. indeed, it is my feeling that a lot of what i have written about with regard to the aims of the euro med organization remains largely unknown to the european populace.
but, given these difficulties in trying to divine what the mollusks mean for the rest of europe, and in evaluating whether their policies have historical vigor and legs, there is one thing which is going to happen pretty soon that might lend some insight into the query, do they mean to purposefully betray europe and sell an entire heritage down the river, or are they simply the last in a long line of arrogant fools who think that they can control and drive history by "policy" manipulations?
i speak, of course, of the upcoming verdict in the geert wilders show trial.
i have written previously on the subject of the dutch show trial, and the euro union legal system. some of these article bear re-examination within the content of this article. here, http://wintersoldier2008.typepad.com/summer_patriot_winter_sol/2010/01/no-1-trilogy-on-wilders-hate-speech-trial-the-private-letters-re-european-tyranny.html here, http://wintersoldier2008.typepad.com/summer_patriot_winter_sol/2010/01/no-3-of-the-trilogy-trilogy-on-wilders-hate-speech-trial-it-is-time-for-a-marbury-vs-madison-moment-.html , and, here, http://wintersoldier2008.typepad.com/summer_patriot_winter_sol/2010/01/you-ask-how-will-the-europeans-oppose-the-euro-union-policies-on-immigration-i-answer-they-cannot-as.html
but, to continue with this essay.--
in my view, if wilders is summarily found guilty of whatever it is that the trial court eventually says he is guilty of, (and g_d only knows what that might be, since the nature of the charges has never been fixed and the nature of what wilders did to be found guilty of something never precisely defined, has never precisely been fixed, … , and, “fixed” it may very well be, eventually), and if he is fined, imprisoned and his party barred from participation in electoral and procedural participation in the governance of the netherlands, then we may quite rightly regard the leftist technocrats as intending the outright naked betrayal of europe, into the hand of islam.
if this is the end sought by the mollusks, it seems to me a fool’s errand, because they will be the first to fall under islam’s knives.
if, however, the delay in announcing wilders’s verdict, (and neither joe stalin nor mao nor adolph hitler ever dithered over a show trial in such a manner) means that some sort of accommodation is being searched for between the parties to the rising perception in germany, england, scandanavia and italy that multiculturalism is a colossal mistake and failure, then perhaps my more moderate stance may gain some sort of added vigor and vitality.
think of what that might mean. it suggests to my mind that the technocrats have, in fact & in actuality, some perception and realization that ethnic and social harmony cannot be achieved between the indigenous european peoples, and the interloping islamic immigrants who show that they are absolutely disinclined to view the euro union as a melting pot of cultures, but, instead, thoroughly evidence every intention of simply taking over. it suggests to my mind, that the technocrats may have finally seen and perceived the limits upon a legalistic diplomacy based on the notion that islam could become “european” in mode and outlook and expression, and that they may realize that they were in error.
if wilders is offered some sort of deal whereby he can remain free, whereby he can continue to speak, and whereby he gains continued participation in european and dutch politics, it suggests to me, quite strongly, that the faceless balless dickless technocrats of the euro union probably recognize that they have made a tremendous diplomatic and political boo boo in this euro med bullshit, and that they might be looking to the likes of geert wilders to fish them out of it.
if they do extend this sort of arrangement to wilders does not mean that they have cured themselves of or shed their intellectual, political and bureaucratic arrogance.
they will try to control wilders.
wilders will not be controlled. oh, if found guilty, he will report to jail. he will serve his time.
and, he shall emerge from jail triumphant, for he shall be vindicated of his views by social developments in europe. if he survives jail, and is not assassinated. if he survives jail, he shall simply overwhelm dutch politics.
but, if he remains free on the conditions of a deal, he will simply continue to operate as he has and he shall dare the dutch authorities to again prosecute him.
he hasn’t sounded very contrite before the tribunal, has he? and, he has offered them no concessions, and by his reference to former dutch martyrs in the same breath as he describes his present prosecution, he has told the dutch authorities, and the dutch people, precisely what his aims are, and how he will accord himself in the future. this suggests to me that wilders believes that he operates from a position of strength, that he has considerable leverage with the public on these issues, and that he is challenging the dutch prosecutors to find him guilty, if they dare. i think he believes that they do not dare, and that he perceives their reticence in doing so to offer the chance for him to emerge from the trial fully functional in dutch politics.
this much we know about wilders, because he is not shy about saying what he believes, and he is at no loss in his ability to explain why he holds to his views, and from whence they spring, and that is his notion of dutch liberty and heritage. and, i think that he has rightfully seized upon that heritage and its history of revered dutch martyrs to gain public support hostile to the euro union law, and hostile to euro union restrictions upon speech being imposed upon a dutch politician.
we shall see. whether i am right, and whether i correctly understand wilders's stance in the matter.
but, we know nothing of his accusers, do we, those dickless wonders, who cannot even define precisely what wilders has done, except displease the dutch authorities. that is what he has done. they may as well have served him with charges that summarized his offense as follows, “boy, you done pissed us off, and royally.”
we shall know more of his accusers, when they read the verdict.
“guilty, as charged,” means precisely that his accusers mean to destroy europe and its nations, and replace it with a multiculturalists’ tyranny obtained and run by and disciplined & administered by islam. the precious little administrative codes for which shall be written by the mollusks, who will have become muslim mollusks, but which shall be governed by sharia: smart little dickless fellows, and on very small and slippery leashs.
it means my previous post, adverted to above, was the more correct view.
“you done pissed us off, but, you can run free as long as you … ,” means precisely that the feckless dickless accusers understand that they have committed major political error by having islam run reckless and rampant upon european soil, after their forefathers spent countless thousands of gallons of blood trying to prevent that very thing.
it means that my recent post may be correct, and that maybe, just maybe, the euro union placed itself in this fix regarding islamic immigration simply as a result of diplomatic miscalculation, and that maybe there is a peaceful way out of this mess with regard to the euro union's role in creating it.
we’ll see.
right now, i try to divine chicken entrails that have not yet been spilled, and scattered upon the marble tables.
we will know more fully, more fully in terms of comprehension as to the technocrats' motivations, at geert wilders’s verdict. do you think that these issues are not being talked about by the euro union technocrats, as they essay what the diplomatic future for the euro union is, and what part they will play in it, and, indeed, whether the european union can withstand this muslim immigration gaffe as well as its economic difficulties. the currency goes to hell, the monetary policy is exposed as a joke, and the very premise for the euro med association agreements and the euro med itself is exposed as a cruel delusion.
and, we will know better, in arriving at a due and proper estimation of things, if europe reels and lurches its way along its path, or whether this whole thing devolves into secular and sectarian civil war, and a dedicated effort to expel islam from europe. and, there is some irony here. because all along, the technocrats have preached and delude themselves as well into believing that only they could avoid civil violence by their machinations and controls. and, in the end, what shall lead to bloody conflict, perhaps hundreds of years in the resolution, was the policy that flowed from the pretense that societies can be controlled by faceless dickless feckless balless technocrats.
who chose to work from the shadows without explaining what they were about and what they were up to, but, tried to intimidate and impose tyranny upon an entire european population, from those shadows. in my view, they deserve the yardarm and the lamppost.
john jay @ 06.14.2011
Comments